"These eerily similar petroglyphs from Japan, Utah, and Azerbaijan throw down the gauntlet on our understanding of ancient civilizations. Nestled in Fugoppe Cave in Japan, scattered throughout Nine Mile Canyon in Utah, and emblazoned in Gobustan, Azerbaijan, each carving presents a winged or flying human figure — a striking visual that begs the question of how three culturally diverse groups, separated by oceans and eons, managed to conceive such an idea.
The timeline adds another layer of intrigue: Japan’s versions are roughly 7,000 years old, Utah’s range from about 1,000 to 2,000 years, while Azerbaijan boasts engravings that could be as much as 10,000 years old."
-1
1.
Joan 1 day ago
#1 So? 
-3
2.
Katelin 1 day ago
#1 So when did they discover it? I'm all ears. Let's hear it. Is there a written record of ancient man crossing the frozen Bering sea dating back 40,000 years or so? Or just some legend about them jumping off the back of a giant turtle onto land? Columbus, the Vikings, whoever and however America was discovered is fine with me, just don't package up this self righteous DEI garbage and preach at me like I'm a defacto racist for not canonizing native Americans.
4
3.
Drew 1 day ago
Katelin,
Actually the dates of artifacts of coastal Aladsk natives (fish trap pegs, and lithographic remains, date back between 20-30,000. There is also new discoveries made with carbon dating man made objects from high mountain areas (which were closer to the water before geological processes). Novice kids who learned random information in proven historically inaccurate textbooks need to shut up or bother to learn the modern facts. Modern science beings all kinds of historical lies to forefront .
Actually the dates of artifacts of coastal Aladsk natives (fish trap pegs, and lithographic remains, date back between 20-30,000. There is also new discoveries made with carbon dating man made objects from high mountain areas (which were closer to the water before geological processes). Novice kids who learned random information in proven historically inaccurate textbooks need to shut up or bother to learn the modern facts. Modern science beings all kinds of historical lies to forefront .
0
4.
Drew 1 day ago
Drew,
*Alaska
*Alaska
1
5.
Drew 1 day ago
#26 As a historian and anthropologist, I can say the dates make total sense. As people migrated across the planet the ages of the images corresponds. And the idea of a winged man is obviously part of the human story telling for eons. I drew the exact same thing as a kid never having g seen these.
0
6.
Nibby 1 day ago
#18 60 is divisible by 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 10, 12, 15, 20 and 30 (without leaving a remainder) making it easy to calculate with.
Actually the dates of artifacts of coastal Aladsk natives (fish trap pegs, and lithographic remains, date back between 20-30,000. There is also new discoveries made with carbon dating man made objects from high mountain areas (which were closer to the water before geological processes). Novice kids who learned random information in proven historically inaccurate textbooks need to shut up or bother to learn the modern facts. Modern science beings all kinds of historical lies to forefront .
*Alaska