X
-9
1.
Hassie 9 month s ago
#5 is nazi banned in the US, or a swear word. Quite strange, as the US is full of fascists
       
9
2.
Helene 9 month s ago
Hassie,

True. But, thankfully they were defeated in our last Presidential election. yahoo
       
10
3.
Patience 9 month s ago
Helene,

They were defeated in Germany yesterday too, by a huge margin. Maybe there won't be anymore arrests of peaceful Christians speaking ill of child murdering islamics. But, I won't hold my breath.
       
-6
4.
Bennie 9 month s ago
Helene,

are you on drugs? your last presidential election ensured that the facists are now in power.

or are you refusing to belive what your own eyes actually see?
       
5
5.
Tess 9 month s ago
Bennie,

You conveniently don't know what "fascist" means. But, you leftists aren't known for being very intelligent.
       
5
6.
Ricka 9 month s ago
Tess,
They keep trying to redefine terms and history to fit their agenda.
       
-6
7.
Nanny 9 month s ago
Hassie,

must be all that free speech!
       
0
8.
Drew 9 month s ago
Hassie,

No. We use Nazi as a descriptive, it's about par with "stupid" and "ugly". I thought the blocking was due to European standards (all the people who refuse to believe in the Holocaust).
       
15
9.
Provy 9 month s ago
What the hell is all the censorship about? There's nothing intrinsically wrong with with Nazi or slave used to describe people in history.
       
-5
10.
Nanny 9 month s ago
Provy,

I think that's what they call "free" speech.
       
0
11.
Drew 9 month s ago
Nanny,
You mean censorship? That's the opposite of "free speech".
       
13
12.
Angelina 9 month s ago
I'm about over the *'s that are censoring comments on this site. Can't talk about Nazis when they're being killed. In fact even 'killed' is censored, and I think children were "Muldered" and "Kissed"....

Izi, we're big kids, we can handle the truth!
       
2
13.
Evelina 9 month s ago
These aren’t facts, they’re anecdotes
       
-5
14.
Raymond 9 month s ago
#2 More than anything else, this shows how backwards the US is, compared with the rest of the (free) world.
       
-3
15.
Raymond 9 month s ago
#12 In any country other than the US, this wouldn't be inspiring. It would pretty much be what people do for other people!
       
-3
16.
Raymond 9 month s ago
#19 Why does the US look at things which were 100 years behind the rest of the world as racial equality achievements?
       
0
17.
Tiff 7 month s ago
#14 Some of the performers whom you young 'uns nowadays would consider to be the dorkiest people on the planet were staunch advocates for equality: Bing Crosby, Ed Sullivan, many Big Band bandleaders, et al. Now it would be hard to imagine the risks they took; but at that time, they risked losing not just their careers, but their lives. Think about that next time you're laughing at the corny old-timers. They had more b@lls than you.
       
0
18.
Winton 6 month s ago
#8 Working 12 hour days, 365 days a year she would have had to plant 456 trees per day. 38 trees per hour. Or more than one tree every every 2 minutes. Have to think that 2 million is a bit of an exaggeration.
       
27353641acute
belayclappingdance3dashdirol
drinksfoolgirl_craygirl_devilgirl_witch
goodgreenheartJC-LOLJC_doubledown
JC_OMG_signkisslaughingman_in_lmocking
mr47_04musicokroflsarcastic
sm_80tonguevishenka_33vomitwassat
yahooshoot

"In 1948, Tony Signorini Walked On Florida Beaches At Night Wearing 30 Lb. Three-Toed Lead Shoes. People Believed The Footprints Were From A 15 Feet Tall Penguin, Thought To Be Extinct. He Kept Up The Prank For Ten Years And Revealed The Hoax 40 Years Later"

X
Random But Incredibly Interesting Facts Shared By People
>
28/29
<