2
1.
Nana 10 month s ago
#21 - first of all, it's 4 /interior/ right angles. Secondly, none of those are right angles due to the curve.
3
2.
Lamont 10 month s ago
Nana, I'm sorry, but your interpretation is not valid.
0
3.
Nibby 10 month s ago
Nana,
so you are saying that a radial is not perpendicular to the circle? You may want to check your math book again.
so you are saying that a radial is not perpendicular to the circle? You may want to check your math book again.
-1
4.
Gee 10 month s ago
Nibby,
OP is correct. A radial would not be part of the arc, therefore, the curve cannot be orthogonal to the straight line. If it were, there would necessarily be an inflection point further up, thus meaning there were more than 4 sides and more than 4 angles.
Maybe *you* should check a calculus book instead of your 4th grade algebra text.
OP is correct. A radial would not be part of the arc, therefore, the curve cannot be orthogonal to the straight line. If it were, there would necessarily be an inflection point further up, thus meaning there were more than 4 sides and more than 4 angles.
Maybe *you* should check a calculus book instead of your 4th grade algebra text.
0
5.
Nibby 10 month s ago
Gee,
yeah you're right
yeah you're right
5
6.
Angelina 10 month s ago
#29 I receive BLOND?
2
7.
Lenora 10 month s ago
Angelina,
Blind. Blend. Bland. Impossible to guess thank god it’s blurred to protect the innocent.
Blind. Blend. Bland. Impossible to guess thank god it’s blurred to protect the innocent.
0
8.
Erin 10 month s ago
Lenora,
It's to protect the advertisers. Nothing is about people, don't worry
It's to protect the advertisers. Nothing is about people, don't worry
0
9.
Lamont 10 month s ago
#7 Dammit Maureen, you couldn't recognise a sign even if it hit you in the forehead.
-1
10.
Erin 10 month s ago
#21 and the sum of the inner angles is 360°?
Those definitions are always very clear because mathematicians are always smartasses and try to find the loopholes
Those definitions are always very clear because mathematicians are always smartasses and try to find the loopholes
so you are saying that a radial is not perpendicular to the circle? You may want to check your math book again.
OP is correct. A radial would not be part of the arc, therefore, the curve cannot be orthogonal to the straight line. If it were, there would necessarily be an inflection point further up, thus meaning there were more than 4 sides and more than 4 angles.
Maybe *you* should check a calculus book instead of your 4th grade algebra text.
yeah you're right
Blind. Blend. Bland. Impossible to guess thank god it’s blurred to protect the innocent.
It's to protect the advertisers. Nothing is about people, don't worry
Those definitions are always very clear because mathematicians are always smartasses and try to find the loopholes