2
1.
Nana 7 month s ago
#21 - first of all, it's 4 /interior/ right angles. Secondly, none of those are right angles due to the curve.
3
2.
Lamont 7 month s ago
Nana, I'm sorry, but your interpretation is not valid.
0
3.
Nibby 7 month s ago
Nana,
so you are saying that a radial is not perpendicular to the circle? You may want to check your math book again.
so you are saying that a radial is not perpendicular to the circle? You may want to check your math book again.
-1
4.
Gee 7 month s ago
Nibby,
OP is correct. A radial would not be part of the arc, therefore, the curve cannot be orthogonal to the straight line. If it were, there would necessarily be an inflection point further up, thus meaning there were more than 4 sides and more than 4 angles.
Maybe *you* should check a calculus book instead of your 4th grade algebra text.
OP is correct. A radial would not be part of the arc, therefore, the curve cannot be orthogonal to the straight line. If it were, there would necessarily be an inflection point further up, thus meaning there were more than 4 sides and more than 4 angles.
Maybe *you* should check a calculus book instead of your 4th grade algebra text.
0
5.
Nibby 7 month s ago
Gee,
yeah you're right
yeah you're right
5
6.
Angelina 7 month s ago
#29 I receive BLOND?
2
7.
Lenora 7 month s ago
Angelina,
Blind. Blend. Bland. Impossible to guess thank god it’s blurred to protect the innocent.
Blind. Blend. Bland. Impossible to guess thank god it’s blurred to protect the innocent.
0
8.
Erin 7 month s ago
Lenora,
It's to protect the advertisers. Nothing is about people, don't worry
It's to protect the advertisers. Nothing is about people, don't worry
0
9.
Lamont 7 month s ago
#7 Dammit Maureen, you couldn't recognise a sign even if it hit you in the forehead.
-1
10.
Erin 7 month s ago
#21 and the sum of the inner angles is 360°?
Those definitions are always very clear because mathematicians are always smartasses and try to find the loopholes
Those definitions are always very clear because mathematicians are always smartasses and try to find the loopholes
so you are saying that a radial is not perpendicular to the circle? You may want to check your math book again.
OP is correct. A radial would not be part of the arc, therefore, the curve cannot be orthogonal to the straight line. If it were, there would necessarily be an inflection point further up, thus meaning there were more than 4 sides and more than 4 angles.
Maybe *you* should check a calculus book instead of your 4th grade algebra text.
yeah you're right
Blind. Blend. Bland. Impossible to guess thank god it’s blurred to protect the innocent.
It's to protect the advertisers. Nothing is about people, don't worry
Those definitions are always very clear because mathematicians are always smartasses and try to find the loopholes