X
10
1.
Howard 6 month s ago
"Just about everything in the Bible"?
       
6
2.
Janie 6 month s ago
Howard, Huge portions of biblical history are corroborated by other contemporary records.
       
0
3.
Lina 6 month s ago
Janie, All good stories, even fiction rely on real locations to make that fiction believable.
       
2
4.
Lina 6 month s ago
#2 Dark Ages refers to a period of ignorance and superstition in Medieval Europe. It actually refers to a lack of written sources during that time period.

Exactly - Lack of written sources === The Dark Ages.
       
6
5.
Jenny 6 month s ago
#2 There are plenty written sources between the fall of Roman society and the European Renaissance. The actual reference about the Dark Ages is too show contempt to the Christian writing and culture during this time. "We have been enlightened by Dark Ages of Christianity." Essentially a piece of propaganda.

#3 Study of Ur and other cities in modern Iraq point to a very different interpretation, that until they were able to store grains and cereals, civilization could not happen. People were too concerned about scrounging for food to put energy into building a society or government or religion or anything else.

Actually, a lot of what is posted here by whoever this is, is false, misrepresents, or needs further context. No citations other than "Trust me, I'm the internet". Drivel.
       
0
6.
Thys 6 month s ago
Jenny,

Until humans were able to use fire for themselves they used almost all of their energy by looking for and consuming food.
Is also a theory, like a lot of other 'findings'.
       
-1
7.
Bias 6 month s ago
Jenny,

All religion keeps people in the "Dark Ages." Especially, Islam.
       
4
8.
Connie 6 month s ago
A little thing to remember, a lack of evidence does not mean that something is either false or true...all it means is that it's currently inconclusive.
       
2
9.
Philinda 6 month s ago
Well, there were some good bits of actual truth then it slouched off into stupid.
       
-1
10.
Bryan 6 month s ago
Thought it was interesting until "everything in the Bible." Then I questioned the validity of the rest of the claims printed here.
       
-3
11.
Jedidiah 5 month s ago
Its OK. Everything will be paradise on earth now that the Christian whites have enforced divinely inspired rule in the US!
Congratulations to you!
       
27353641acute
belayclappingdance3dashdirol
drinksfoolgirl_craygirl_devilgirl_witch
goodgreenheartJC-LOLJC_doubledown
JC_OMG_signkisslaughingman_in_lmocking
mr47_04musicokroflsarcastic
sm_80tonguevishenka_33vomitwassat
yahooshoot

Rome burned while Nero fiddled. It's technically true so it doesn't fit the OPs question. However, most people seem to think Bero did that because he was crazy because ... Well Nero was cray-to-the-zee crazy. But the reality on this particular occasion is *much* more nuanced. Nero was already playing the fiddle when he heard the news of the fire in the tenements of Rome. This is important for a few reasons *1. The tenements were housing the poor or the plebes as tge Romans referred to them. And like all powerful people in history Nero cared considerably less for the poor than the rich. *2. The fire was in the tenements. Nero had been imploring people NOT to expand the tenements so much because the Romans had such a habit of expansion that it was fairly typical for the tops of buildings to be wider than the base because after all you can only expand so much at ground level before you run into the road. But three or four stories up its a different story and the owners of the tenements would often add more living quarters to the tops of the building to get more people in their buildings. As a result some tenements were sharing walls on the third and fourth floors with neighbors that were separated by N entire road. This led to more than a few collapses. That in turn prompted Nero to start trying to rally support from the other elite senators about town to outlaw such building practices. Right as that was going on the fire breaks out. In Neros mind the fire is yet another reason why the tenements are being built dangerously. And so he didn't react with shock because he'd been arguing for a little while that the tenements were dangerous. Lastly. People say he fiddled while Romee burned implying that he did nothing. But the reality is that professional firefighting brigades didn't really come about until the early 20th century. Prior to that in say roman times fires got put out by volunteers who made ends meet by robbing the homes they were helping deal with fires. So even If Nero thought something needed to be done there was no force he could assign to combat the fire.As a result Nero just kept on with his practice because there wasn't anything he could really do AND even if there was he wouldn't have wanted to because he felt the fire proved his point about the tenements being poorly constructed. NOT because he was crazy...for once.

X
Widely Accepted History That Never Actually Happened
>
18/21
<