X
10
1.
Howard 6 month s ago
"Just about everything in the Bible"?
       
6
2.
Janie 6 month s ago
Howard, Huge portions of biblical history are corroborated by other contemporary records.
       
0
3.
Lina 6 month s ago
Janie, All good stories, even fiction rely on real locations to make that fiction believable.
       
2
4.
Lina 6 month s ago
#2 Dark Ages refers to a period of ignorance and superstition in Medieval Europe. It actually refers to a lack of written sources during that time period.

Exactly - Lack of written sources === The Dark Ages.
       
6
5.
Jenny 6 month s ago
#2 There are plenty written sources between the fall of Roman society and the European Renaissance. The actual reference about the Dark Ages is too show contempt to the Christian writing and culture during this time. "We have been enlightened by Dark Ages of Christianity." Essentially a piece of propaganda.

#3 Study of Ur and other cities in modern Iraq point to a very different interpretation, that until they were able to store grains and cereals, civilization could not happen. People were too concerned about scrounging for food to put energy into building a society or government or religion or anything else.

Actually, a lot of what is posted here by whoever this is, is false, misrepresents, or needs further context. No citations other than "Trust me, I'm the internet". Drivel.
       
0
6.
Thys 6 month s ago
Jenny,

Until humans were able to use fire for themselves they used almost all of their energy by looking for and consuming food.
Is also a theory, like a lot of other 'findings'.
       
-1
7.
Bias 6 month s ago
Jenny,

All religion keeps people in the "Dark Ages." Especially, Islam.
       
4
8.
Connie 6 month s ago
A little thing to remember, a lack of evidence does not mean that something is either false or true...all it means is that it's currently inconclusive.
       
2
9.
Philinda 6 month s ago
Well, there were some good bits of actual truth then it slouched off into stupid.
       
-1
10.
Bryan 6 month s ago
Thought it was interesting until "everything in the Bible." Then I questioned the validity of the rest of the claims printed here.
       
-3
11.
Jedidiah 5 month s ago
Its OK. Everything will be paradise on earth now that the Christian whites have enforced divinely inspired rule in the US!
Congratulations to you!
       
27353641acute
belayclappingdance3dashdirol
drinksfoolgirl_craygirl_devilgirl_witch
goodgreenheartJC-LOLJC_doubledown
JC_OMG_signkisslaughingman_in_lmocking
mr47_04musicokroflsarcastic
sm_80tonguevishenka_33vomitwassat
yahooshoot

Polish Cavalry charged at German tanks with lances and sabres in 1939. The Polish Cavalry was a very high-prestige part of Polish armed forces, and had a lot of history behind them - Napoleon's lancers, Winged Hussars and so on. By 1939, the Polish cavalry were highly mobile infantry units really, but were used in the same way as NATO planned to use jeep squads in the event of a Soviet invasion - set up an ambush with anti-tank weapons, knock out a couple of tanks, retire to the next position quickly and set up another ambush etc.There were even examples of the Polish cavalry divisions bringing the Panzers to a dead stop, for example the Battle of Mokra.The "charging tanks with cavalry" myth seems to have originated in a specific incident on the first day of the invasion, the Skirmish at Krojanty.Although trained as mobile anti-tank/dragoon units, Polish cavalry retained the sabre, just in case. On 1 September, the 18th Pomeranian Uhlans were covering a retreat when they spotted a unit of German infantry resting in a clearing. Colonel Mastelarz decided to take them by surprise and ordered a sabre charge of about 250 cavalry. The charge was successful and the German infantry - who can't have been expecting cavalry with sabres charging them - dispersed into the trees with heavy casualties.At that point, some German armoured cars appeared and laid into the cavalry, causing some casualties (including Col. Mastelarz) and driving the rest off.In the aftermath, the German casualties were cleared away and the Poles left, and some neutral war correspondents were invited to come and see, and told that the cavalrymen had been killed while charging at tanks with sabres.The story circulated rapidly, not only among the German and sympathetic presses (to whom the moral of the story was supposed to be "Look how stupid and backward the Poles are - we're doing them a favour by bringing German civilisation"), but also in the British and French presses, who swallowed the story whole, but there the moral was "Look how suicidally brave the romantic Poles are - isn't this just the sort of people we should be supporting?"Then, after the war, the Communist Polish government, eager to seize on anything that would make the pre-war government look bad, perpetuated the myth, with the moral now being "Look what the old capitalist government did for you - forcing soldiers to face Panzers with sword and lance!"In other words the same, fake, story has been repeated by f*****t, democratic and communist sources each to serve their own narrative of the invasion if 1939.

X
Widely Accepted History That Never Actually Happened
>
9/21
<