I agree, there's enough crap already in the net. Please stop spreading these obvious lies. Even though I like science and hope for helpful advance, that's not how it works. A reference to the claim would ve optimal
#44 *NUMBER* of noisy children. The word is NUMBER. As in: a high NUMBER of noisy children make a large AMOUNT of noise.
Making water from sunlight... Right. Iz, I don't know how you do it. I could never post this garbage because it would be too embarrassing, no matter how many clicks it would get me.
I agree, there's enough crap already in the net. Please stop spreading these obvious lies. Even though I like science and hope for helpful advance, that's not how it works. A reference to the claim would ve optimal
#44 *NUMBER* of noisy children. The word is NUMBER. As in: a high NUMBER of noisy children make a large AMOUNT of noise.
Making water from sunlight... Right. Iz, I don't know how you do it. I could never post this garbage because it would be too embarrassing, no matter how many clicks it would get me.
- #42 No, they didn't.
A reference to the claim would ve optimal
scitechdaily.com/artificial-photosynthesis-breakthrough-revolutionary-gel-turns-
sunlight-directly-into-clean-fuel/
Making water from sunlight... Right. Iz, I don't know how you do it. I could never post this garbage because it would be too embarrassing, no matter how many clicks it would get me.