X
2
1.
Ode 8 hours ago
#30. So sick of this one.
It’s about BUOYANCY!
       
0
2.
Jeb 8 hours ago
Ode,

I agree - Rose would have floated if she was the one in the water. ????
       
0
3.
Jeb 8 hours ago
Those question marks were supposed to be a laughing face.

JC-LOL
       
1
4.
Ode 8 hours ago
#3. So dumb. Doesn’t even need explanation.
       
2
5.
Ode 8 hours ago
#28. Not a plot hole. Just really bad writing.
       
0
6.
Violetta 19 min ago
Ode,

The whole Star Wars franchise is bad writing from start to end. 'In a galaxy far far away'? That is the literal definition of the universe; everything is far away from everything. Not to say that everybody in said galaxy keeps speaking english. How convenient.
       
-4
7.
Vessie 6 hours ago
I started this as a simple side hustle, and last month I made a little over $6,137 just working a few hours a day from my phone. If you want to check out how it works, the website has all the details.

Join Here--->> tinyurl.com/payathome1net
       
27353641acute
belayclappingdance3dashdirol
drinksfoolgirl_craygirl_devilgirl_witch
goodgreenheartJC-LOLJC_doubledown
JC_OMG_signkisslaughingman_in_lmocking
mr47_04musicokroflsarcastic
sm_80tonguevishenka_33vomitwassat
yahooshoot

Ant-Man (2015)

"The MCU got a fun jolt of unorthodox humor with 2015’s Ant-Man, starring Paul Rudd. Rudd’s superhero can shrink down to the size of an ant and back. But there’s a rule that he’s told often: His mass doesn’t change. He weighs the same tiny as he did normal. If taken seriously, this would render essential moments, like ants picking a tiny Ant-Man up, impossible. It would also mean he couldn’t sneak around vents — his weight would collapse them instantly. And in Captain America: Civil War, his growing bigger wouldn’t give him super strength."

 
X
These Movie Plot Holes Are Inexcusable!
>
17/40
<