X
4
1.
Ode 17 hours ago
#30. So sick of this one.
It’s about BUOYANCY!
       
0
2.
Jeb 17 hours ago
Ode,

I agree - Rose would have floated if she was the one in the water. ????
       
0
3.
Jeb 17 hours ago
Those question marks were supposed to be a laughing face.

JC-LOL
       
1
4.
Ode 17 hours ago
#3. So dumb. Doesn’t even need explanation.
       
2
5.
Ode 17 hours ago
#28. Not a plot hole. Just really bad writing.
       
0
6.
Violetta 9 hours ago
Ode,

The whole Star Wars franchise is bad writing from start to end. 'In a galaxy far far away'? That is the literal definition of the universe; everything is far away from everything. Not to say that everybody in said galaxy keeps speaking english. How convenient.
       
-7
7.
Vessie 15 hours ago
I started this as a simple side hustle, and last month I made a little over $6,137 just working a few hours a day from my phone. If you want to check out how it works, the website has all the details.

Join Here--->> tinyurl.com/payathome1net
       
27353641acute
belayclappingdance3dashdirol
drinksfoolgirl_craygirl_devilgirl_witch
goodgreenheartJC-LOLJC_doubledown
JC_OMG_signkisslaughingman_in_lmocking
mr47_04musicokroflsarcastic
sm_80tonguevishenka_33vomitwassat
yahooshoot

Titanic (1997)

"Despite letting go, they’re never letting go. The love story of Jack and Rose, played by Leonardo DiCaprio and Kate Winslet, is doomed from the start of Titanic. We know this, based on the movie’s title alone. But it doesn’t stop us from becoming emotionally invested. We do have one question. Why didn’t Rose just, like, move a couple inches to her left? If you look at that raft, and you look at how tiny 1997-Leo is, it is obvious that there’s enough room for him to fit and for them to live their dang lives!"

 

X
These Movie Plot Holes Are Inexcusable!
>
30/40
<