X
0
1.
Ode 4 hours ago
#30. So sick of this one.
It’s about BUOYANCY!
       
0
2.
Jeb 3 hours ago
Ode,

I agree - Rose would have floated if she was the one in the water. ????
       
0
3.
Jeb 3 hours ago
Those question marks were supposed to be a laughing face.

JC-LOL
       
0
4.
Ode 3 hours ago
#3. So dumb. Doesn’t even need explanation.
       
0
5.
Ode 3 hours ago
#28. Not a plot hole. Just really bad writing.
       
-1
6.
Vessie 2 hours ago
I started this as a simple side hustle, and last month I made a little over $6,137 just working a few hours a day from my phone. If you want to check out how it works, the website has all the details.

Join Here--->> tinyurl.com/payathome1net
       
27353641acute
belayclappingdance3dashdirol
drinksfoolgirl_craygirl_devilgirl_witch
goodgreenheartJC-LOLJC_doubledown
JC_OMG_signkisslaughingman_in_lmocking
mr47_04musicokroflsarcastic
sm_80tonguevishenka_33vomitwassat
yahooshoot

"Lara Croft: Tomb Raider (2001)"

"The kind of plot hole that gives directors and scriptwriters nightmares can be found in Lara Croft: Tomb Raider – Angelina Jolie’s fun but flawed video game adaptation from 2001. The film focuses on Lara Croft’s mission to protect the world from the Illuminati, who are planning to use an artefact called the Triangle during a solar eclipse to inflict devastation on the world – a peak 00s plot if ever we’ve heard one. We learn that the Triangle is split into two parts, and after acquiring the first of them in Cambodia, Croft sets off on another perilous journey to retrieve the second in Siberia. The problem is, we already know the Triangle can’t work without both halves, so all Croft had to do was destroy the half she already had in her possession and the job would be done."

 

X
These Movie Plot Holes Are Inexcusable!
>
9/40
<