X
0
1.
RayZer 14 year s ago
Yeah... they are probably fake.
       
0
2.
Dyana 14 year s ago
Most of them look so.. fake.
       
0
3.
NemesisKismet 14 year s ago
Uh, yeah. It's called double exposure. Fake through and through. It was too easy to make these types of photos back then. And it still is.
       
0
4.
YEah!!! 14 year s ago
You are right nemesis. it's double exposure and only a fuckass like izismile can fall for this shit.
First they ban smilies and now post this type of ridiculous shit here.
Take a dump somewhere else izi..
       
0
5.
fsdgh 14 year s ago
must be since assholes like the two above come here nowadays.
       
0
6.
Ron 14 year s ago
Although I don't agree the way #4 posted, it is true that it is double exposure and like #3 stated, it was easy to make photos like this back then but likely these happened by accident. I have never seen a current photo like this and that's because of technological advancements to prevent this from happening.
       
0
7.
damaja 14 year s ago
Creepy...
       
0
8.
loomy 14 year s ago
i think he used the same film twice.. so he shot 2 objects on the same film square..
       
0
9.
severe_009 14 year s ago
Easy does it
       
0
10.
autoversicherung vergleich 14 year s ago
I had been arguing with my close friend on this issue for quite a while, base on your ideas prove that I am right, let me show him your webpage then I am sure it must make him buy me a drink, lol, thanks.

- Kris
       
27353641acute
belayclappingdance3dashdirol
drinksfoolgirl_craygirl_devilgirl_witch
goodgreenheartJC-LOLJC_doubledown
JC_OMG_signkisslaughingman_in_lmocking
mr47_04musicokroflsarcastic
sm_80tonguevishenka_33vomitwassat
yahooshoot
X
Spiritual Photos
>
3/22
<