X
Comments to #1
All comments (8)
1
1.
vishpri 13 year s ago
haha, you fooled me!
1
2.
CAPLOCK 13 year s ago
Keep it simple stupid!
0
3.
Bobaliciousunderwear 13 year s ago
Wow, such trickery. Damn you and your cunning IZI!
0
4.
whatsername 13 year s ago
got me there. those are cool though
0
5.
severe_009 13 year s ago
Nice
0
6.
laughinggas 13 year s ago
Didn't fool me. When new planets are discovered they're way too distant to get clear pictures of.
0
7.
mary joy 12 year s ago
the planet discovered is nice
0
8.
Pablo 12 year s ago
I understand the goal of deetimrning which ideas generate the most interest within Wharton Computing. However, on a site that's supposed to foster brainstorming and new ideas, why should the rating system should go into negative numbers? That's why I don't use it. What about assigning positive ratings to ideas we like and just not rating the ones we don't? That way we could still understand which items are hot without outright dinging the ones that aren't.
Scroll down to see.
1
2.
CAPLOCK 13 year s ago
Keep it simple stupid!
0
3.
Bobaliciousunderwear 13 year s ago
Wow, such trickery. Damn you and your cunning IZI!
0
6.
laughinggas 13 year s ago
Didn't fool me. When new planets are discovered they're way too distant to get clear pictures of.
0
7.
mary joy 12 year s ago
the planet discovered is nice
0
8.
Pablo 12 year s ago
I understand the goal of deetimrning which ideas generate the most interest within Wharton Computing. However, on a site that's supposed to foster brainstorming and new ideas, why should the rating system should go into negative numbers? That's why I don't use it. What about assigning positive ratings to ideas we like and just not rating the ones we don't? That way we could still understand which items are hot without outright dinging the ones that aren't.