1
1.
jubyp0b 12 year s ago
#9 - AOL is / was (not sure if it's still operational) a global internet service and media company. Windows 8 is an OS.
It's like saying: "This bed right here looks like bad cheese from 20 years ago. Therefore, this bed must be bad." It's such a damned sophism.
It's like saying: "This bed right here looks like bad cheese from 20 years ago. Therefore, this bed must be bad." It's such a damned sophism.
0
2.
Undye 12 year s ago
@jubyp0b lol - it's like saying that you can't compare Windows Mobile with Android OS because Microsoft creates- Operating systems for PCs:). [ * AOL once tried to get into the "OS market" but failed - just like google tried the social networking ;)
0
3.
jubyp0b 12 year s ago
@ Undye
Just googled it. Guess what Google turned out..wait for it..NOTHING! Whoah, would you look at that? IF AOL tried anything close to an OS, it left no news of it whatsoever. Hence - it was a project, never to be completed, they weren't even close to an OS.
But that has nothing to do with the sophism in the the picture before mentioned. Why aren't they posting a picture of the AOL OS if they're referring to it. It must have had a name, right? It must have had some kind of interface, huh?
It's like taking a picture of a rooster and saying it's a cow. Because, hey, they have something in common, right?
All you did is affirm the fact that there is a sophism. You yourself used one.
Just googled it. Guess what Google turned out..wait for it..NOTHING! Whoah, would you look at that? IF AOL tried anything close to an OS, it left no news of it whatsoever. Hence - it was a project, never to be completed, they weren't even close to an OS.
But that has nothing to do with the sophism in the the picture before mentioned. Why aren't they posting a picture of the AOL OS if they're referring to it. It must have had a name, right? It must have had some kind of interface, huh?
It's like taking a picture of a rooster and saying it's a cow. Because, hey, they have something in common, right?
All you did is affirm the fact that there is a sophism. You yourself used one.
-1
4.
Esnopser 12 year s ago
jubyp0b, you are new around here aren't you? On earth, I mean...
0
5.
Peanut 12 year s ago
Welcome to Izismile, jubyp0b. You sound like you have a functioning brain.
It's like saying: "This bed right here looks like bad cheese from 20 years ago. Therefore, this bed must be bad." It's such a damned sophism.
Just googled it. Guess what Google turned out..wait for it..NOTHING! Whoah, would you look at that? IF AOL tried anything close to an OS, it left no news of it whatsoever. Hence - it was a project, never to be completed, they weren't even close to an OS.
But that has nothing to do with the sophism in the the picture before mentioned. Why aren't they posting a picture of the AOL OS if they're referring to it. It must have had a name, right? It must have had some kind of interface, huh?
It's like taking a picture of a rooster and saying it's a cow. Because, hey, they have something in common, right?
All you did is affirm the fact that there is a sophism. You yourself used one.