2009: Miss March
Critic Score: 7/100
User Score: 5.0/10
Synopsis: “A young man awakens from a four-year coma to hear that his once virginal high-school sweetheart has since become a centerfold in one of the world’s most famous men’s magazines.”
Critic Review: “This is bad. Not bad in a way that it might be fun to see when inebriated. Bad in a way from which only death provides immunity. Forget waterboarding – just show Guantanamo detainees Miss March and they’ll say anything.”
-James Berardinelli / Reel Views
*Editors opinion: Whitest Kids U’ Know is one of the greatest shows ever.
3
1.
ZombieDarwin 6 year s ago
WTF? The majority of these reviews were written by Michael Moore, er, I mean, Roger Ebert, a.k.a. Humorless Progressive Sh^thead. I can think of 4 films right off the top of my head that are worse than the worst of these. I'm surprised Roger didn't eat the films as he reviewed them.
0
2.
ZombieDarwin 6 year s ago
You know, something has been bothering me about 2016's Hillary's America, and I've finally put my finger on it. The review is: *“Little more than an extended version of the kind of political screeds that can be found online with only a minimum of effort, this is just a terrible movie.”
-Roger Ebert*
The movie was released in 2016. Ebert died in 2013. Unless he's been able to send his reviews from Hell (I imagine they wouldn't have any problem securing the film itself, seeing as how Hillary was Lucifer's candidate), there's no way Ebert could have reviewed this film. So either the review is fake, the review is wrongly attributed, or this is just some political hit piece. The middle one is most likely, although the last is possible, too.
-Roger Ebert*
The movie was released in 2016. Ebert died in 2013. Unless he's been able to send his reviews from Hell (I imagine they wouldn't have any problem securing the film itself, seeing as how Hillary was Lucifer's candidate), there's no way Ebert could have reviewed this film. So either the review is fake, the review is wrongly attributed, or this is just some political hit piece. The middle one is most likely, although the last is possible, too.
-Roger Ebert*
The movie was released in 2016. Ebert died in 2013. Unless he's been able to send his reviews from Hell (I imagine they wouldn't have any problem securing the film itself, seeing as how Hillary was Lucifer's candidate), there's no way Ebert could have reviewed this film. So either the review is fake, the review is wrongly attributed, or this is just some political hit piece. The middle one is most likely, although the last is possible, too.