2011: Bucky Larson: Born to Be a Star
Critic Score: 9/100
User Score: 3.3/10
Synopsis: “A kid from the Midwest moves out to Hollywood in order to follow in his parents footsteps — and become a porn star.”
Critic Review: “So obvious and lazy that it borders on pathetic.”
-Mack Rawden / Cinema Blend
3
1.
ZombieDarwin 6 year s ago
WTF? The majority of these reviews were written by Michael Moore, er, I mean, Roger Ebert, a.k.a. Humorless Progressive Sh^thead. I can think of 4 films right off the top of my head that are worse than the worst of these. I'm surprised Roger didn't eat the films as he reviewed them.
0
2.
ZombieDarwin 6 year s ago
You know, something has been bothering me about 2016's Hillary's America, and I've finally put my finger on it. The review is: *“Little more than an extended version of the kind of political screeds that can be found online with only a minimum of effort, this is just a terrible movie.”
-Roger Ebert*
The movie was released in 2016. Ebert died in 2013. Unless he's been able to send his reviews from Hell (I imagine they wouldn't have any problem securing the film itself, seeing as how Hillary was Lucifer's candidate), there's no way Ebert could have reviewed this film. So either the review is fake, the review is wrongly attributed, or this is just some political hit piece. The middle one is most likely, although the last is possible, too.
-Roger Ebert*
The movie was released in 2016. Ebert died in 2013. Unless he's been able to send his reviews from Hell (I imagine they wouldn't have any problem securing the film itself, seeing as how Hillary was Lucifer's candidate), there's no way Ebert could have reviewed this film. So either the review is fake, the review is wrongly attributed, or this is just some political hit piece. The middle one is most likely, although the last is possible, too.
-Roger Ebert*
The movie was released in 2016. Ebert died in 2013. Unless he's been able to send his reviews from Hell (I imagine they wouldn't have any problem securing the film itself, seeing as how Hillary was Lucifer's candidate), there's no way Ebert could have reviewed this film. So either the review is fake, the review is wrongly attributed, or this is just some political hit piece. The middle one is most likely, although the last is possible, too.