2
1.
Lonny 1 year ago
#33 Echinops ritro. Will bloom blue
8
2.
Heloise 1 year ago
#15
That's why if you're tearing down an old house you want to try and salvage as much wood as possible, it was all old growth timber and is better than what you get today.
That's why if you're tearing down an old house you want to try and salvage as much wood as possible, it was all old growth timber and is better than what you get today.
5
3.
Harty 1 year ago
#43 Dual flush toilets are mandatory for new buildings in most Australian states.
7
4.
Zadie 1 year ago
#20 I didn't know the Declaration of Independence was eggs on a shell...
4
5.
Zadie 1 year ago
#25 His problem is rather his nail care
0
6.
Dre 1 year ago
Zadie,
strange my son had one of his fingers chopped off same place and it never "grew back"
strange my son had one of his fingers chopped off same place and it never "grew back"
8
7.
Zadie 1 year ago
#43 Mostly in every bathroom in Western Europe... Not the case in the U.S ??
2
8.
Lavinia 1 year ago
Zadie,we have them in the US. I have them in my house.
-2
9.
Midge 1 year ago
Zadie,
its the same regardless of which button you push. it doesn't save much clean water
its the same regardless of which button you push. it doesn't save much clean water
-1
10.
Deborah 1 year ago
Midge,
No. It's obviously not the same. If you use the save button you use around 67% less water. (source: any plumber).
But don't take my word for it! You can simply use your very own ears to hear it flushes less and therefore doesn't need to refill as much thus using significantly less water which is good for the environment not to mention your wallet.
What exactly is your claim that it's the same despite these logical facts any 5 year old child would understand by him or herself? Does the water save button initiate a hologram that brainwashes us in thinking we use less water?
No. It's obviously not the same. If you use the save button you use around 67% less water. (source: any plumber).
But don't take my word for it! You can simply use your very own ears to hear it flushes less and therefore doesn't need to refill as much thus using significantly less water which is good for the environment not to mention your wallet.
What exactly is your claim that it's the same despite these logical facts any 5 year old child would understand by him or herself? Does the water save button initiate a hologram that brainwashes us in thinking we use less water?
1
11.
Riche 1 year ago
Deborah,
Why do you need to attack Midge? It's not productive and devalues your comment
Why do you need to attack Midge? It's not productive and devalues your comment
-3
12.
Deborah 1 year ago
Riche,
I'm not attacking him. I'm proving him wrong with facts to back it up. I'm not just gonna let him spread lies and misinformation unopposed
I understand you want to further his conspiracy nonsense by this. I mean, I've seen comments of yours that point that you have a lot of the same ideas. And it's cute you want to try it like this.
Try to disprove the facts if you can...
I'm not attacking him. I'm proving him wrong with facts to back it up. I'm not just gonna let him spread lies and misinformation unopposed
I understand you want to further his conspiracy nonsense by this. I mean, I've seen comments of yours that point that you have a lot of the same ideas. And it's cute you want to try it like this.
Try to disprove the facts if you can...
1
13.
Pasoonie 1 year ago
Deborah, misinformation from anonymous sources on the internet are very serious - if not corrected then people may believe it and that could lead to worldwide mayhem
4
14.
Lillah 1 year ago
For anyone that wants to know #45 is a Royal poinciana
0
15.
Simon 1 year ago
Lillah,
thanks!
thanks!
0
16.
Geoffrey 1 year ago
Stupid 
-3
17.
Lucas 1 year ago
#29 - The smoke weighs more than the coal ? Yeah right.
2
18.
Fenrisulven 1 year ago
Lucas,
As the text says: "When this is burned, uniting with oxygen....". This oxygen comes from the atmosphere. There will be two oxygen atoms per carbon atom, and the oxygen atom is also a bit heavier than carbon. So the resulting CO2 will be heavier than the carbon in the coal.
As the text says: "When this is burned, uniting with oxygen....". This oxygen comes from the atmosphere. There will be two oxygen atoms per carbon atom, and the oxygen atom is also a bit heavier than carbon. So the resulting CO2 will be heavier than the carbon in the coal.
2
19.
Jeremiah 1 year ago
#15 Two samples of wood from different eras and probably different regions with different growing conditions. Perhaps different types of wood. One has tight grain and one does not. So what? Too many people jump to conclusions based on insufficient and selectively presented data.
0
20.
Emmy 1 year ago
Jeremiah,
You are missing the point. It's not about the type of wood, but its size. The older piece is really a 2x4, while what is being sold as a 2x4 nowadays (depending on the region) is really a 1.75 x 3.5 piece of lumber
You are missing the point. It's not about the type of wood, but its size. The older piece is really a 2x4, while what is being sold as a 2x4 nowadays (depending on the region) is really a 1.75 x 3.5 piece of lumber
0
21.
Eudora 1 year ago
#9 Still waaaaay cheaper than many other places
That's why if you're tearing down an old house you want to try and salvage as much wood as possible, it was all old growth timber and is better than what you get today.
strange my son had one of his fingers chopped off same place and it never "grew back"
its the same regardless of which button you push. it doesn't save much clean water
No. It's obviously not the same. If you use the save button you use around 67% less water. (source: any plumber).
But don't take my word for it! You can simply use your very own ears to hear it flushes less and therefore doesn't need to refill as much thus using significantly less water which is good for the environment not to mention your wallet.
What exactly is your claim that it's the same despite these logical facts any 5 year old child would understand by him or herself? Does the water save button initiate a hologram that brainwashes us in thinking we use less water?
Why do you need to attack Midge? It's not productive and devalues your comment
I'm not attacking him. I'm proving him wrong with facts to back it up. I'm not just gonna let him spread lies and misinformation unopposed
I understand you want to further his conspiracy nonsense by this. I mean, I've seen comments of yours that point that you have a lot of the same ideas. And it's cute you want to try it like this.
Try to disprove the facts if you can...
thanks!
As the text says: "When this is burned, uniting with oxygen....". This oxygen comes from the atmosphere. There will be two oxygen atoms per carbon atom, and the oxygen atom is also a bit heavier than carbon. So the resulting CO2 will be heavier than the carbon in the coal.
You are missing the point. It's not about the type of wood, but its size. The older piece is really a 2x4, while what is being sold as a 2x4 nowadays (depending on the region) is really a 1.75 x 3.5 piece of lumber