2
1.
Lea 2 year s ago
#5 Imagine the roundhouse kicks possible with those
#30 Gave me a hard laugh! I literally can hear Cartman. Mom, BATHROOM! :D And the Driver must watch...
#30 Gave me a hard laugh! I literally can hear Cartman. Mom, BATHROOM! :D And the Driver must watch...
13
2.
Thaddeus 2 year s ago
#33 - I think the next 007 is going to be a black woman at which point the series will have ended for me. Not because I'm racist but you just don't change such a long-standing series to accommodate political correctness. Make a new movie with 008 or something.
-7
3.
Armena 2 year s ago
Thaddeus,
Since, in the Bond Universe, the 007 designation is issued by the Government - creating a new designation to present the same privileges seems unlikely (albeit in line with government inflation, waste and unnecessary complexity).
If the movies were called 'Bond' (like 'Reacher' or 'Riddick' or all of Keanu Reeves movies) where the titular character is the plot, then you may have a legitimate perspective.
As it stands, while you can hold the view that a black actor playing a super-secret british agent with global 'license to kill' shouldn't happen with the same 007 designation - it still makes you sound real dumb.
Since, in the Bond Universe, the 007 designation is issued by the Government - creating a new designation to present the same privileges seems unlikely (albeit in line with government inflation, waste and unnecessary complexity).
If the movies were called 'Bond' (like 'Reacher' or 'Riddick' or all of Keanu Reeves movies) where the titular character is the plot, then you may have a legitimate perspective.
As it stands, while you can hold the view that a black actor playing a super-secret british agent with global 'license to kill' shouldn't happen with the same 007 designation - it still makes you sound real dumb.
11
4.
Thaddeus 2 year s ago
Armena, That's because you lack perspective. There are no long running, multi-part movies that star black actors so it's a little difficult for you to understand - but imagine if, after Chadwick Boseman died, (Black Panther actor) he was replaced by a white guy so that the writers and directors could ensure that they were being diverse - that'd be stupid, right? It's the same principle here.
-5
5.
Armena 2 year s ago
Thaddeus,
There are no black people in Britain? Since there are, and they are likely employed by the government, then it is reasonable for a 007 designation to be granted to one who achieves such proficiency... unless you are arguing that only cis white men can be trained killers?
Since there is, as per comic-lore, only one white person in Wakanda - the Black Panther's adopted Brother - Hunter the White Wolf; your 'racial diversity' statement is stupid from start to finish.
So - no, I do not lack perspective you hack.
There are no black people in Britain? Since there are, and they are likely employed by the government, then it is reasonable for a 007 designation to be granted to one who achieves such proficiency... unless you are arguing that only cis white men can be trained killers?
Since there is, as per comic-lore, only one white person in Wakanda - the Black Panther's adopted Brother - Hunter the White Wolf; your 'racial diversity' statement is stupid from start to finish.
So - no, I do not lack perspective you hack.
2
6.
Midge 2 year s ago
Armena,
yeah tons of imported blacks and muslims. it's just a matter of skin-colored hire.
yeah tons of imported blacks and muslims. it's just a matter of skin-colored hire.
2
7.
Abednego 2 year s ago
Thaddeus,
I don’t have a problem with someone black playing Bond (Idris Elba would rock in that role).
I do have a problem with a woman (of any race ) playing 007.
I don’t have a problem with someone black playing Bond (Idris Elba would rock in that role).
I do have a problem with a woman (of any race ) playing 007.
-1
8.
Sis 2 year s ago
#31 The first Charles was an idiot who declared war on his own people. The second was a syphilitic drunk. This Charles looks a good one though. At least he isn't a Stuart.
0
9.
Chloe 2 year s ago
Sis,
Third time's the charm?
Third time's the charm?
0
10.
Midge 2 year s ago
Sis,
this charles looks good hurr durr. i wonder what the history books will drum up about this literal waste of space.
this charles looks good hurr durr. i wonder what the history books will drum up about this literal waste of space.
1
11.
Olph 2 year s ago
#50 put it in the wives' purse
#30 Gave me a hard laugh! I literally can hear Cartman. Mom, BATHROOM! :D And the Driver must watch...
Since, in the Bond Universe, the 007 designation is issued by the Government - creating a new designation to present the same privileges seems unlikely (albeit in line with government inflation, waste and unnecessary complexity).
If the movies were called 'Bond' (like 'Reacher' or 'Riddick' or all of Keanu Reeves movies) where the titular character is the plot, then you may have a legitimate perspective.
As it stands, while you can hold the view that a black actor playing a super-secret british agent with global 'license to kill' shouldn't happen with the same 007 designation - it still makes you sound real dumb.
There are no black people in Britain? Since there are, and they are likely employed by the government, then it is reasonable for a 007 designation to be granted to one who achieves such proficiency... unless you are arguing that only cis white men can be trained killers?
Since there is, as per comic-lore, only one white person in Wakanda - the Black Panther's adopted Brother - Hunter the White Wolf; your 'racial diversity' statement is stupid from start to finish.
So - no, I do not lack perspective you hack.
yeah tons of imported blacks and muslims. it's just a matter of skin-colored hire.
I don’t have a problem with someone black playing Bond (Idris Elba would rock in that role).
I do have a problem with a woman (of any race ) playing 007.
Third time's the charm?
this charles looks good hurr durr. i wonder what the history books will drum up about this literal waste of space.