#4 A theory is still a theory, but in the science community it's backed by facts and repeatedly corroborated, though not yet proven irrefutably. In the general sense, it's more of a random thought or idea not yet put to test.
#6 Biggest scam today: CO2 causes catastrophic global warming.
The correlation between CO2 and temperature is very weak over long periods of time. And when there is a correlation, CO2 increase comes AFTER temperature increase.
That's pretty much what I said. No correlation between CO2 and temperature. However, during certain periods of time, CO2 increases do follow increases in temperature. This makes sense since warmer land & water hold less CO2 so it comes out into the atmosphere. Just like a bottle of soda warming up.
Still spreading fake news and lies I see... Anyone can find the truth. Just don't look for it on Infowars, in conspiracy YouTube vids, and the like like these two and you'll find it.
No. I read both sides of the science and draw my own conclusions. There is NO evidence that human activity is driving global temperature. The only "evidence" provided are climate models - which have been wrong on just about every prediction. The main driver of temperature is water vapor (clouds). This is too complex to model, so the models fail.
#5 well yeah but nobody reads instructions anymore and the new stuff breaks faster because the big corporations are banning the "right to repair" or making it impossible so you have to buy new
#4 A theory is still a theory, but in the science community it's backed by facts and repeatedly corroborated, though not yet proven irrefutably. In the general sense, it's more of a random thought or idea not yet put to test.
#6 Biggest scam today: CO2 causes catastrophic global warming.
The correlation between CO2 and temperature is very weak over long periods of time. And when there is a correlation, CO2 increase comes AFTER temperature increase.
That's pretty much what I said. No correlation between CO2 and temperature. However, during certain periods of time, CO2 increases do follow increases in temperature. This makes sense since warmer land & water hold less CO2 so it comes out into the atmosphere. Just like a bottle of soda warming up.
Still spreading fake news and lies I see... Anyone can find the truth. Just don't look for it on Infowars, in conspiracy YouTube vids, and the like like these two and you'll find it.
No. I read both sides of the science and draw my own conclusions. There is NO evidence that human activity is driving global temperature. The only "evidence" provided are climate models - which have been wrong on just about every prediction. The main driver of temperature is water vapor (clouds). This is too complex to model, so the models fail.
#5 well yeah but nobody reads instructions anymore and the new stuff breaks faster because the big corporations are banning the "right to repair" or making it impossible so you have to buy new
only one is a type of golf
And Hank Johnson thought that islands can tip over. Politicians are stupid. News at 11.
The correlation between CO2 and temperature is very weak over long periods of time. And when there is a correlation, CO2 increase comes AFTER temperature increase.
soo close... but the is no correlation or causation between co2 levels and temps.
That's pretty much what I said. No correlation between CO2 and temperature. However, during certain periods of time, CO2 increases do follow increases in temperature. This makes sense since warmer land & water hold less CO2 so it comes out into the atmosphere. Just like a bottle of soda warming up.
Still spreading fake news and lies I see...
Anyone can find the truth. Just don't look for it on Infowars, in conspiracy YouTube vids, and the like like these two and you'll find it.
No. I read both sides of the science and draw my own conclusions. There is NO evidence that human activity is driving global temperature. The only "evidence" provided are climate models - which have been wrong on just about every prediction. The main driver of temperature is water vapor (clouds). This is too complex to model, so the models fail.
both "sides" of science? which one had the pictures? I don´t think you got it right ;)
Yes, the scientific process is always trying to falsify the existing hypotheses. That's how real science works.
Don't speak of things you don't understand. And insults are not a valid counterpoint.
Would that be "attack"?