X
2
1.
Susan 1 year ago
#6 - the new one is decent but it definitely did not outshine the original. Given a choice I’d watch the 1951 version.
       
2
2.
Wyncha 1 year ago
Susan,

no.
       
2
3.
Susan 1 year ago
Wyncha, yes
       
2
4.
Rusty 1 year ago
Susan,

1951 is a very good movie
carpenters version is a masterpiece
the prequel is pretty decent too
       
1
5.
Jackie 1 year ago
#11 - Oye the topic of this was successful reboots. The Tom Cruise one was the reboot and that failed spectacularly.
       
1
6.
Virdie 1 year ago
#5 .... and now FUTARAMA
       
1
7.
Muriel 1 year ago
#10 I have to agree. Karl Urban did a great job.

#13 It shouldn’t have been a made for tv movie. Now that it’s ok to divide a book into 14 different movies, it played better. They still avoided the one thing that makes it a very creepy book by a very creepy writer.

#17 Me too.

#19 Totally different. The show was dramatic while the movie was comedy action. Apples and oranges.

#1 I could never get into it. It’s such a stupid premise. Just like Transformers.
       
27353641acute
belayclappingdance3dashdirol
drinksfoolgirl_craygirl_devilgirl_witch
goodgreenheartJC-LOLJC_doubledown
JC_OMG_signkisslaughingman_in_lmocking
mr47_04musicokroflsarcastic
sm_80tonguevishenka_33vomitwassat
yahooshoot

“The 2010s Planet of the Apes movies were pretty damn good.”

 

X
Resurrected Excellence: Successful Reboots In Cinema
>
1/19
<