-1
1.
Jonathan 11 month s ago
I know this won't work, but getting something peer reviewed means letting a bunch of people who all have the same opinion pick apart what you researched. If it fits with the group think, it is good. If they disagree, it is bad. The group think is guided by agenda, so peer review stifles any research outside the agenda.
0
2.
Armanda 11 month s ago
Jonathan,
You have no idea.
Getting something peer reviewed means letting a bunch of people try to prove your work wrong. If they can't find any mistakes, it's probably correct and should be published. Your work is now in the public. More people will try to reproduce it or prove it wrong.
'same opinion' lol
You have no idea.
Getting something peer reviewed means letting a bunch of people try to prove your work wrong. If they can't find any mistakes, it's probably correct and should be published. Your work is now in the public. More people will try to reproduce it or prove it wrong.
'same opinion' lol
1
3.
Molly 11 month s ago
Armanda,
Bless your heart.. i actually work in academia and he has a point. if it fits the narrative then you get tenured. there is no bonus in going against trends with facts.. go look up how a group of guys made a paper about dogs rape to Hitler's mein kampf. got it reviewed and it won awards. there are So Many papers most dont care and put popular names on the bottom. Go watch Andy Stapleton.
Bless your heart.. i actually work in academia and he has a point. if it fits the narrative then you get tenured. there is no bonus in going against trends with facts.. go look up how a group of guys made a paper about dogs rape to Hitler's mein kampf. got it reviewed and it won awards. there are So Many papers most dont care and put popular names on the bottom. Go watch Andy Stapleton.
2
4.
Glory 11 month s ago
Molly,
From the way you express yourself in your posts, the only position in academia I can imagine you hold is that of school janitor.
And I state that with profound apology to any and all janitors I may have offended.
From the way you express yourself in your posts, the only position in academia I can imagine you hold is that of school janitor.
And I state that with profound apology to any and all janitors I may have offended.
2
5.
Ivan 11 month s ago
Glory, The fact that you seek to denigrate janitors says a lot about your view of life and understanding of value in humanity.
Armanda is right: a study was done a few years ago that revealed more than half of "scientific studies" published in even the most prestigious journals were not replicable, as in never were given proper and rigorous scientific peer review or studied to any significant degree.
Armanda is right: a study was done a few years ago that revealed more than half of "scientific studies" published in even the most prestigious journals were not replicable, as in never were given proper and rigorous scientific peer review or studied to any significant degree.
8
6.
Junie 11 month s ago
#44 In other words, quantum physics is comparable to reefer madness 
2
7.
Laurence 11 month s ago
#4 Actually it is impossible to do it that way. Not because it has not been tried to disprove it in the described manner, but because any proof against evolution is rejected in advance. If you do not believe me, look it up.
1
8.
Ivan 11 month s ago
#4 Also, if you have any evidence proving it, you will win a Nobel prize.
2
9.
Archilles 11 month s ago
#16 is dumb!!!
There are 2 hydrogen atoms in a water molecule!
H2O thats it.
I never counted but am pretty sure there are more than 2 stars on the night sky?
There are 2 hydrogen atoms in a water molecule!
H2O thats it.
I never counted but am pretty sure there are more than 2 stars on the night sky?
You have no idea.
Getting something peer reviewed means letting a bunch of people try to prove your work wrong. If they can't find any mistakes, it's probably correct and should be published. Your work is now in the public. More people will try to reproduce it or prove it wrong.
'same opinion' lol
Bless your heart.. i actually work in academia and he has a point. if it fits the narrative then you get tenured. there is no bonus in going against trends with facts.. go look up how a group of guys made a paper about dogs rape to Hitler's mein kampf. got it reviewed and it won awards. there are So Many papers most dont care and put popular names on the bottom. Go watch Andy Stapleton.
From the way you express yourself in your posts, the only position in academia I can imagine you hold is that of school janitor.
And I state that with profound apology to any and all janitors I may have offended.
Armanda is right: a study was done a few years ago that revealed more than half of "scientific studies" published in even the most prestigious journals were not replicable, as in never were given proper and rigorous scientific peer review or studied to any significant degree.
There are 2 hydrogen atoms in a water molecule!
H2O thats it.
I never counted but am pretty sure there are more than 2 stars on the night sky?