• Don't insult other visitors. Offensive comments will be deleted without warning.
• Comments are accepted in English only.
• No swearing words in comments, otherwise such comments will be censored.
• Your nickname and avatar are randomly selected. If you don't post comments for 7 days, they both are reset.
• To choose another avatar, click the ‘Random avatar’ link.
You have no idea.
Getting something peer reviewed means letting a bunch of people try to prove your work wrong. If they can't find any mistakes, it's probably correct and should be published. Your work is now in the public. More people will try to reproduce it or prove it wrong.
'same opinion' lol
Bless your heart.. i actually work in academia and he has a point. if it fits the narrative then you get tenured. there is no bonus in going against trends with facts.. go look up how a group of guys made a paper about dogs rape to Hitler's mein kampf. got it reviewed and it won awards. there are So Many papers most dont care and put popular names on the bottom. Go watch Andy Stapleton.
From the way you express yourself in your posts, the only position in academia I can imagine you hold is that of school janitor.
And I state that with profound apology to any and all janitors I may have offended.
Armanda is right: a study was done a few years ago that revealed more than half of "scientific studies" published in even the most prestigious journals were not replicable, as in never were given proper and rigorous scientific peer review or studied to any significant degree.
There are 2 hydrogen atoms in a water molecule!
H2O thats it.
I never counted but am pretty sure there are more than 2 stars on the night sky?