"I think most jobs are safe, which is an unpopular opinion. AI generated content is mediocre at best, and the PR nightmare that follows getting called out on it is a dumpster fire. Maybe in 10-20 years this concept of job security can be revisited.
But right now, AI just is quite sub-par at delivery in a non-ideal environment."
0
1.
Arminda 8 month s ago
With the exception of writing papers and articles, AI is a big nothing burger ATM. AI might be important 100 years from now but we are no where even close to it being an issue now.
1
2.
Maria 8 month s ago
Simulated intelligence is as intelligent as it is coded.
plenty of errors and wrongful collection of information some times.
plenty of errors and wrongful collection of information some times.
0
3.
Valerie 8 month s ago
#6 Whoa on this one! It would be much more interesting and probably more exciting to watch robots rather than bad-acting humans play soccer.
1
4.
Otis 8 month s ago
Valerie,
then watch the robocup, it has been around for some 25 years.
then watch the robocup, it has been around for some 25 years.
-1
5.
Clifton 8 month s ago
#10 Bullsh#t
0
6.
Otis 8 month s ago
What gets oversold as "AI" those days is just an intelligence simulation that's clever enough to convince laymen to overhype and invest in this BS.
As of right now, I don't see any REAL danger from "AI". It has to get better by order of magnitudes to be a real threat.
As of right now, I don't see any REAL danger from "AI". It has to get better by order of magnitudes to be a real threat.
1
7.
Virdie 8 month s ago
Otis,
True, most current AI is nothing more than a parrot, just regurgitation trained phrases, which means it's Algorithm Intelligence NOT artificial intelligence.
True, most current AI is nothing more than a parrot, just regurgitation trained phrases, which means it's Algorithm Intelligence NOT artificial intelligence.
0
8.
Gwen 8 month s ago
For some reason, I get this feeling AI is somewhere in the same neighborhood of people who invested in NFT's. If everyone can do it/have it, it's not that special at all and just becomes a money sink or a cheap tool to promote more talentless people.
0
9.
Virdie 8 month s ago
I disagree with almost all of these. AI is a tool, and as a tool, it can be trained to do ANYTHING that requires intellect. Just because it isn't trained to do it now (therapist, artist, surgeon, tracher) doesn't mean it won't ever be trained (remote learning is NOT AI and can not be compared). Most studies show AI is nowhere ear perfect but depending on purpose of use has proven to improve and become better at many jobs that "only humans can do". Reality isn't based on opinions, like religion and politics, so AI can do real things like government and social laws super easy.
0
10.
Harriet 8 month s ago
I'm sorry but, massage therapist? Okay, so no it's not AI but most people here just seem to think ai means robotics or tech anyway.
I have a neck massager that heats and massages my neck, those chairs at thr mall are amazing, and those water jet beds are better than ANY human message I've EVER had. Now, add a SIMPLE AI program that learns the speed, pressure, and area it's human owner likes and responds to best and it could EASILY do that job. In fact, that would be SO much better than a human. Don't get me wrong, I love getting a massage from an SO but lying in a bed while a stranger rubs my nearly naked body? I've had one professional massage in my nearly 40 years of life and I've never left a room more uncomfortable and stressed in my life. I would much prefer an AI learning massage machine over a human message therapist anyway.
Sure, there are plenty of jobs some people will ALWAYS prefer a human to do. I personally love self-checkout while many people hate it. But, a job human will still be able to get paid to do is not the same as a job AI will never be able to do
I have a neck massager that heats and massages my neck, those chairs at thr mall are amazing, and those water jet beds are better than ANY human message I've EVER had. Now, add a SIMPLE AI program that learns the speed, pressure, and area it's human owner likes and responds to best and it could EASILY do that job. In fact, that would be SO much better than a human. Don't get me wrong, I love getting a massage from an SO but lying in a bed while a stranger rubs my nearly naked body? I've had one professional massage in my nearly 40 years of life and I've never left a room more uncomfortable and stressed in my life. I would much prefer an AI learning massage machine over a human message therapist anyway.
Sure, there are plenty of jobs some people will ALWAYS prefer a human to do. I personally love self-checkout while many people hate it. But, a job human will still be able to get paid to do is not the same as a job AI will never be able to do
plenty of errors and wrongful collection of information some times.
then watch the robocup, it has been around for some 25 years.
As of right now, I don't see any REAL danger from "AI". It has to get better by order of magnitudes to be a real threat.
True, most current AI is nothing more than a parrot, just regurgitation trained phrases, which means it's Algorithm Intelligence NOT artificial intelligence.
I have a neck massager that heats and massages my neck, those chairs at thr mall are amazing, and those water jet beds are better than ANY human message I've EVER had. Now, add a SIMPLE AI program that learns the speed, pressure, and area it's human owner likes and responds to best and it could EASILY do that job. In fact, that would be SO much better than a human. Don't get me wrong, I love getting a massage from an SO but lying in a bed while a stranger rubs my nearly naked body? I've had one professional massage in my nearly 40 years of life and I've never left a room more uncomfortable and stressed in my life. I would much prefer an AI learning massage machine over a human message therapist anyway.
Sure, there are plenty of jobs some people will ALWAYS prefer a human to do. I personally love self-checkout while many people hate it. But, a job human will still be able to get paid to do is not the same as a job AI will never be able to do