• Don't insult other visitors. Offensive comments will be deleted without warning.
• Comments are accepted in English only.
• No swearing words in comments, otherwise such comments will be censored.
• Your nickname and avatar are randomly selected. If you don't post comments for 7 days, they both are reset.
• To choose another avatar, click the ‘Random avatar’ link.
But that 2nd lad? Common, you don´t have to take that much space. To your right 1,50m as well or what was your plan? Absolutely deserved to got driven over, when you drive in the middle of a road as a cyclist!
In almost every country there is a maximum width for the bicycle and cargo. Don't exceed that width or the insurance company wins.
In Germany they tried to make the bicycle wider on the street side with a small flexible strip. The results were exactly the opposite of what was expected: if your car didn't touch the strip, the driver was sure he was driving within a sufficient distance. (the distance that drivers kept on average became less.)
Sorry you are abolutely wrong. These cycelists try to show the required minimum distance of 1,5m according to $5 StVO Abs4) cars have to keep when they overtake the cycelists.
I bet every downvote is of someone that has NEVER EVER ridden their bicycle in any "real" traffic.
yes because we are not dump enough to drive a bicycle trough "real" traffic. Buy a f***ing car!
all that 1,5m is bullshit.... do not make bike paths on the road, its lazy engineering... make it separate, so you do not need 1,5m rule... and it will be safer. more expensive sure, but safer. because thats what you want, right?
Lol... my exact thought!
Every sentence proves that you are an idiot. Each one of them. Imbecile.
You've obviously haven't seen motorcyclist's where I'm from. They ride as if they're daring every car to kill them. When I was a child in the 1970's in New England, it was not uncommon to see the Boston Chapter of the Hell's Angels riding loud and proud in very large packs and actually obeying traffic laws.