Twilight Nutcase Bashes Harry Potter (6 pics)

Posted in PICTURES       2 Mar 2011       29309       80

Surely, everyone has made their own opinion about Twilight and Harry Potter. Here is just another comparison of these two movies by a Twilight fan.

 



Advertisement


80   Comments ?
7
1.
vishpri 9 year s ago
very funny! Twiligt sucks...
       
8
2.
Annoyed. 9 year s ago
I hope to GOD this is a joke, or else someone has some serious problems and might need to go visit the nice men with the special jackets and padded rooms.
       
4
3.
meukr 9 year s ago
jeez!!!!how many times do i have to say this?....twilight is GAY!!!
       
2
4.
uzurutonkashi 9 year s ago
troll
       
0
5.
Arshad 9 year s ago
Twilight sucks and its for gays... Harry Potter is the best... GO GRYFFINDOR....
       
3
6.
a 9 year s ago
Haha, Jennifer Aniston!
       
6
7.
ggcm1122 9 year s ago
I love the fact i the last part it talks about how good her English is when her grammer and spelling is atrocious!!! Blatantly done by an 11 year old
       
0
8.
Pat 3 month s ago
kuuluud,
Well, i love hp but each to their own. Also,. Thank u
       
4
9.
L 9 year s ago
I can't believe this is real. There just cannot be anyone that stupid, surely!
       
3
10.
735 9 year s ago
bullshit...
       
0
11.
Sizomu 9 year s ago
..... LOL, what is the lesser of 2 evils? even thinking of choosing is retarded!
       
1
12.
Archlord 9 year s ago
Either way, the author is a piece of shit lmao
       
5
13.
349 9 year s ago
Was this person really implying that pirates don't exist in that first argument?
       
3
14.
anonym 9 year s ago
Holy shit i truly hope she does not reproduce!
       
2
15.
Izabela 9 year s ago
psycho fan of twilight. jesus save her soul ;ppp
       
2
16.
Bøb 9 year s ago
why she even compering the 2?

must have a hard time sleeping at night knowing the world rather read harry potter then to read twilight shait
       
3
17.
mia 9 year s ago
ok....
this is fucking dumb as hell!
now honestly i need to say im fucking sick and tired of all this shit of everyone hatting on the other series. wanna know something? i fucking love both twilight and harry potter!everyone has their own damn opinions, alright? so lets leave it like that
on another note, this chick is so dumb she makes a piece of shit look smart.another reason why twilighters have a bad rep.
       
3
18.
Romeowy 9 year s ago
oO so many wrong here, I don't even know where to begin !
       
4
19.
youre dumb 9 year s ago
harry potter has nothing to do with pot. jennifer anniston didnt write harry potter. harry potter came out in '96 so if anything twilight copied it. youre gonna say magic isnt real while you worship fucking twinkling vampires and werewolves that cant keep their shirts on. youre clearly 13 and you need to stay off the internet
       
-1
20.
hilios 9 year s ago
wow this post just wow umm... so many times she has to remind us shes not a lesbian umm... but other then that everyone else your posts took the words right outta my mouth... btw i thinks she is a lesbian

I fell that this needs to be said, 1) as the post before mine pointed out, the person who posted obviously has lesbian tendencies (good detective skills), and 2) as it is proper I must point out that OP is a faggot
       
-4
21.
Satanas 9 year s ago
I think both series are shit. You kids should start to read some real lietarature.
       
4
22.
old feller 9 year s ago
HAHA!

First Twilight - 2005

First Harry Potter - 1997

ya, it's pretty obvious that a young one did this....pirates are make believe...wizardy is OLD, the idea predates vampirism I'm sure.

And she thinks that god approves of it? LOL!
       
3
23.
zyzzyva 9 year s ago
Harry Potter came first though, right? herpderp

I love how the title says Twilight NUTCASE
       
1
24.
whatsername 9 year s ago
this is hilarious :D

though if really made by a 11-year-old twilight freak who loves jesus, is totally not lesbian and doesn't even take a puff
sad.
       
2
25.
Norm101 9 year s ago
Obvious troll is obvious.
       
2
26.
Apu Kalipshis 9 year s ago
AAHHHHHHHahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahhahahahahahahahahahahahahahahah
ahahaha
       
1
27.
Frosch 9 year s ago
what is up with the font that's used?

"Sans Serif" is the gayiest of gay fonts

and only used by amateurs !!!
       
1
28.
26 9 year s ago
#7
+1
       
0
29.
abc 9 year s ago
Do so many of you really believe this is real and not a spoof, or are all those comments a form of satire as well?
       
1
30.
Peanut 9 year s ago
This has got to be a joke. People need to go read Bram Stoker's 'Dracula' & J.R.R. Tolkien's 'Lord of the Ring'.
       
3
31.
einsib 9 year s ago
The sad thing is that there is an actual probable possibility that this is not a joke...
       
3
32.
kuuluud 9 year s ago
I'm not a fan of harry potter but i'd rather watch all harry potters movies in a row than watch 1 twilight movie.
       
1
33.
ChrisR 9 year s ago
I might sound old for saying this, but here goes:

Back in my days, vampires sucked blood, not cock!
       
2
34.
DianaN 9 year s ago
Really? I mean, seriously?
       
0
35.
The Original Anonymous 9 year s ago
# 1
# harry potter COPIED TWILIGHT
# 5
       
2
36.
Linnea 9 year s ago
How did Harry Potter Copy Twilight when Harry Potter was out before Twilight was ever even thought of. Sirius Black was NOT the werewolf, Remus Lupin was. On the subject of things that aren't real, vampires don't exist any more than wizards do, and pirates DO exist. And arguments 4 and 5 don't even make any sense and have no bearing over the quality of the books. And argument 6 is also very weak, a lot of authers (C.S. Lewis, D.H. Lawrence and E.E. Cummings to name a few) have used initials as pen names, and their work would not have been any different if they had used their full names. YOU FAILED.
       
3
37.
Linnea 8 year s ago
Not to mention the fact that Sirius Black wasn't a werewolf..
       
3
38.
Michelle 9 year s ago
I don't really understand all this. Harry Potter has been around for almost 10 years. Twilight has been out for about 3 or 4 years. I like both series but the fact the HP was out way before Twilight makes it impossible for HP to be copied from Twilight!
       
2
39.
Hippiehappy 9 year s ago
the person who has done this is either 12 years old or retarded, or both. Either way, I found the whole thing amusing. Until the second slide, at which point I got bored and thought I'd share this. Yawn.
       
1
40.
izumi38 9 year s ago
This is shit. Twilight sucks and Harry Potter is the BEST. Twilight can't be compared with something that big as HP.
       
1
41.
Enter your name 9 year s ago
well thats not JK Rowing its jennifer aniston you idiot
and that black last name which book published first?HARRY POTTER ! god damn that's just plenty rude!
       
1
42.
molly 9 year s ago
you totally fail. agreed with everybody^ about how harry potter couldn't possibly copy twilight, what does how famous the authors are got to do with anything? JK Rowling has made millions from HP anyway, and in the UK she is more famous. However it has nothing to do with their work.
       
1
43.
shocked 9 year s ago
This just goes to show that Twilight's target market are dumb little teenage girls *sigh* It makes me lose faith in all humanity
       
2
44.
Jasmine 9 year s ago
This is frickin' hysterical!!!
I think a rock is smarter.
But for one thing, Harry Potter was published years before Twilight. There's no way J.K. Rowling could have copied her.
And her name on the book is shortened to J.K. because then both boys and girls might want to read the books. They wouldn't reject the idea of reading it just because a woman wrote it.
I'm not even going to bother with the other reasons because they're just ridiculous. I like both of the series but Harry Potter is farther up on my favorite book list.
       
1
45.
EAW 9 year s ago
WHAT THE HELL IS THE MATTER WITH YOU!?!?!?!?!?! JK Rowling is a freaking genius!!! she published harry potter way before stephanie mayer published twilight! harry potter has been huge ever since the first book! that was 9 years ago. twilight just came out and there aren't nearly as many people into it. JK Rowling was living off of food stamps while writing the first book. Now she's the richest woman in the world. This trumps the queen of England because all of her wealth goes to the country as well. Stephanie clearly did not do as well in her books as JK Rowling. Case and Point!!!
       
1
46.
Enter your name 8 year s ago
It was actually 10 years but other than that your completely right
       
1
47.
kneazlezz 9 year s ago
AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
HAHAHAHAHA
HAH
HA
troll. its gotta be.
if not:
i aint even gonna bother trying to prove you wrong, cuz i dont have time to waste pointing out every single stupid mistake in there.
1 thing though, you said J.K. is racist, but homophobic is just as bad.
ima go read harry potter now.
       
1
48.
UltraMel 9 year s ago
Can only be a troll! Omg
       
1
49.
Kima 9 year s ago
Someone let the troll out of the dungeon again didn't they? Oh well, least we have something besides glitter and spray on abs to fight it with. :3
       
1
50.
Enter your name 8 year s ago
LMAO!

Newer generations kill me with their stupidity XD XD
       
1
51.
Enter your name 8 year s ago
WHOA!!! How could J.K. Rowling STEAL Jacob Black's character?!?!?! HARRY POTTER AND THE PRISONER OF AZKABAN WAS PUBLISHED BEFORE THE IDEA OF TWILIGHT WAS EVEN MADE!!! FOR ALL WE KNOW, STEPHANIE MEYER COULD'VE STOLEN SIRIUS BLACK'S CHARACTER!!! Harry Potter for the win :D
       
1
52.
Enter your name 8 year s ago
Look about the Harry potter creates pottheads I know a girl who use to do crack and she read twilight so that proves its not the book and what does the logo have to do with the story and go logo doesn't make up for the fact all those super powere vampires do is talk about Bella and Edwards love life for about to 2 hours only to have a weak 5 minute fight scene at the end and god wouldn't support Harry potter bc of wizards and he won't support twilight bc of vampires
       
1
53.
Farandfewbetween 8 year s ago
Dissecting the Dipshitness.

A. If you paid attention in history class you would know that centuries ago PIRATES did exist. VAMPIRES, WEREWOLVES AND WIZARDS HOWEVER DO NOT.
B. It's Sirius Black and just because his last name is Black doesn't mean the persons skin color has to be. PS Jacob Black is Native American, *gasp*
NOT BLACK.
C. I'm not even going to get into logos....you wouldn't understand it anyways.
D. Meanings? Really? OK...

Twilight - The diffused light from the sky during the early evening or early morning when the sun is below the horizon
and its light is refracted by the earth's atmosphere.
Light - Electromagnetic radiation that has a wavelength in the range from about 4,000 (violet) to about 7,700 (red)
angstroms and may be perceived by the normal unaided human eye.
Good - Having the qualities that are desirable or distinguishing in a particular thing
Pure - Having a homogeneous or uniform composition; not mixed; free of foreign elements; having no faults.

Potter is a LAST NAME brainiac nowhere does it imply the readers or movie goers should be smoking pot. I've seen the movies and guess what....I don't
smoke pot. I may start though since you put it in my head that I am doing the wrong thing by NOT smoking pot as the title characters namesake says
I should be.

E. The first Harry Potter book came out in 1997 and Twilight came out in 2005

Finally...F. I find it sad that you think that just because you don't know who J.K. Rowling is she isn't famous. Joanne Rowling took
the pen name J.K. Rowling because she didn't think that young boys would read a book written by a woman.

I am a fan of BOTH Harry Potter and Twilight I guess that makes me a Pot smoking Jesus lover. Seriously though, before you go posting bullshit like
this DO YOUR HOMEWORK!
       
1
54.
Enter your name 8 year s ago
Wait so bc sirus's last name is black he has to be a black guy? What if his last name was white but had a black actor would you be mad then too and Jacob isn't black if you look it up the people who played the werewolves had to give proof they were Indian bc the characters in the story were part of an ancient indian tribe
       
0
55.
Enter your name 8 year s ago
You know what after I finish reading the mortal instruments series I'm gonna read twilight just to see what the big deal is!
       
1
56.
Emmeline 8 year s ago
For your information ... Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban was published in 1999. If my calculations are correct, that's about six years before the first Twilight book appeared. Unless Stephenie Meyer has a Time-Turner and can magically go back in time, there is NO POSSIBILITY Rowling took the name and the characteristics from her. Also, there was no mentioning in the book of Sirius Black being black and what's it matter whether they cast a white or a black person? Black is a surname, you dolt and last time I checked, surnames do not influence the color of your skin. Besides, it's not up to Rowling to cast the actors, that's up to the casting bureau. Thirdly, I have never even HEARD of Harry Potter telling people to become potheads, just because the first three letters of his last name are Pot. That's the same as saying crackers make you crave crack, just because the letters are nearly all similar. Fourthly, J.K. Rowling wrote her books as J.K. Rowling so as to attract a larger audience. There are a lot of authors who just use the initials of their first names. Besides, the picture you have for J.K. Rowling is not J.K. Rowling, that's Jennifer Aniston. And if you don't know who J.K. Rowling is, you've been living under a rock for the past fifteen years. And fifthly, J.K. Rowling devoted fifteen years of her life to seven amazing books and it's noticeable. Fact remains, the Harry Potter - series are seven of the best books of our century and you'd have to be one hell of a writer to top them or even come near them. I suggest you get your facts straight before you post bullshit like this.
       
0
57.
Enter your name 8 year s ago
Dumbledore looks and sometimes acts like gandolf in lord of the rings but we don't hear people talking about Harry potter stealing from lord of the rings and also I never heard of Meyers until the twilight movie was made so that means she isn't famous right? I never heard of Michael Jackson to my dad starting playing thriller in the car does that mean he isn't famous? No they were famous before I knew them and just bc JK Rowling was unknown to you before now doesn't mean she isn't famous
       
0
58.
Reason 8 year s ago
ATTENTION EVERYONE!!! THE PERSON THAT ORGINALLY PUT THIS UP DID IT AS A JOKE! THEY ARE ACTUALLY A HARRY POTTER FAN! IF YOU DON'T CALM DOWN BEFORE COMMENTING YOU HAVE JUST DONE SOME SHAME TO HARRY POTTER BY NOT EVEN STOPPING TO THINK BEFORE SPREADING HATE. HARRY WOULD NEVER ENDORSE YOUR BEHAVIOR. REMEMBER ALL THAT YOU LEARNED FROM THE BOOKS YOU LOVE. HAVE A GOOD DAY.
       
1
59.
funkymonkey 8 year s ago
um 1.Harry Potter's Sirius Black was created YEARS before twilight's jacob black was 2.pirates are REAL!!!!! I mean you think pirates aren't real and vampires/werewolves are? 3.that is not J.K. Rowling 4.if my teacher said I write like Stephanie Meyer, I would be insulted 5.twilight has NOTHING to do with God and Harry Potter has NOTHING to do with pot 6. WOW you cant spell, +its his lightning bolt scar, not a twitch CONCLUTION : if your going to deny Harry Potter is better (which in my opinion it is) at least get your facts right
       
1
60.
gopens 8 year s ago
Wow whoever wrote this is the BIGGEST IDIOT ever Harry Potter is WAY better than twilight.
       
1
61.
Enter your name 8 year s ago
Are u insane... Harry Potter rules... Twilight sucks..
       
0
62.
Cristin 8 year s ago
Anyone else notice she said Tittles instead of Titles. It made me giggle uncontrollably.

Btw, I love both series. But, this person is a douche...
       
1
63.
Ditto 8 year s ago
Excuses, excuses. Harry Potter is obviously better.
       
0
64.
HP 8 year s ago
WTF? yur an idot. dont u know harry potter was written before Twighlight?
       
0
65.
hplover 8 year s ago
wow your a dumbass!
       
0
66.
Random Name Here 8 year s ago
Are you an idiot?
       
0
67.
HPFan 8 year s ago
Who cares about the box sets and Wizards do not exist as much as Vampires. It's Sirius, not Serious and Harry Potter was years before Twilight, so Twilight is a rip off, actually. And Twilight is just a weather were as HP is a name. An original one at that. Nothing to do with Hairy and Pots. Lastly, the author. It does not matter how they look like as long as they can write well, so yeah.
P.S Please do not right U right you and things like that.

P.P.S I haven't even listed all the bad stuff about Twilight, I'd be writing for infinity.
P.P.P.S Or the good HP stuff :)
       
0
68.
Check 6 month s ago
oh I hope this is a joke.
pleeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeease
       
0
69.
Kizza 5 month s ago
She has not read Harry Potter at all. I will leave it at that.

But please, please fact check before you post random nonsense online!

This is quite worrying.
       
0
70.
Kizza 5 month s ago
And I was not thinking that Twilight is better than Harry Potter.
       
0
71.
Kizza 5 month s ago
And the “wiggly stem” on the P in Potter represents the lightning scar on Harry’s forehead. Also, on the 1st argument slide when you said you do not believe in wizards and (SOMEHOW) Pirates, are you saying that you believe in Vampires and Werewolves? And you should have checked which came first before accusing Harry Potter of stealing the (completely shallow, undeveloped and badly written) character of Jacob Black, please check which came first. If anything, Twilight stole from Harry Potter. And your comment on racism was in itself quite racist. I am white, but my surname does not have to be White. In the books (If you had bothered to read them to check what you were trashing) you can see that Sirius Black is described as pale. And that brings me to the final topic; J.K Rowling has grossed 15 times more and has far more global recognition than both the Twilight Saga and it’s author, Ms. Meyer. And Jennifer Aniston is not, no matter what you believe, J.K Rowling.
       
0
72.
Cenia 4 month s ago
Kizza,

No matter how much you love Jesus, he can not turn Jennifer Aniston in J.K Rowling.
       
0
73.
Kizza 5 month s ago
Oh and also Edward and Bella’s relationships meets all 15 criteria set by the National Domestic Violence Hotline for being in an abusive relationship. So make of that what you will.

And does she think that a Jesus approves of this after she blatantly ignores many basic facts that SHE SHOULD KNOW and uses a cacophony of swear words?
       
0
74.
Kizza 5 month s ago
Sirius Black came first.
       
0
75.
Cenia 4 month s ago
Okay so does light always have to mean good? What if the “Copied” character of Sirius Black (who came first, sooooo) rode in on the “perfect, hot, non - female, non - lesbian Jacob Black in wolf form holding a GLOW IN THE DARK WEAPON would of still mean GOOD, PURE AND JESUS?
       
2
76.
Lamont 4 month s ago
I just feel bad for you son because you are the most [email protected]#king person I know so [email protected]#k yeah and I am pretty confident that you are the world biggest b*tch and so [email protected]#k yeah
       
0
77.
Essy 4 month s ago
Please.... no........... I just cant deal with this level of stupidity...... JC-LOL
       
1
78.
Pat 3 month s ago
Well. WELL.
1)
Harry potter is in a treasure chest because it is a treasure.
2)
Harry potter no.1 came out in 1997. Twilight came out in 2005. Twilight copied Harry potter. And jk. Rowling did not choose the cast, although she is a complete arse.(explained later)
3)
If you have even watched the first 3 minutes of the philosophers stone you will know exactly what the stem on the P is. The Twilight logo is simple and not at all recognisable. It looks like it was designed by a three year old on his parent's computer.
4)
Harry is a name and it doesn't have anything to do with the word hairy. Potter has nothing to do with pots. And Twilight means entering the darkness.
5)
Stephanie Meyer cannot write to save her life. And just so you are aware, neither can you. Jk. Rowling is a complete arse and she is extremely transphobic but at least she has a successful writing career. The Harry Potter books are a treasure to a lot of people, including me. I read them in 2004 when I was six years old and they have been dear to me ever since. So please do not say that because:
1)
You are severely endangering your life here and
2)
You must not tell lies.
dance3
       
1
79.
Pat 3 month s ago
Pat,
PS
I meant to say 2014 not 2004
       
0
80.
Margery 1 weeks ago
Although I do not agree with everything JK Rowling has said or written (cough "women who menstruate" cough Cursed Child is not canon cough), nobody can deny the fact that she is an extremely successful author who created a book series beloved by millions of people. She was the first person to become a billionaire by writing books alone.

If my teacher told me my writing reminded her of Stephanie Meyer's, I would not have been happy. The C you got on your essay is probably 10% due to the fact that it was late and 90% due to your terrible writing, as evidenced by this atrocity.
       
27353641acute
belayclappingdance3dashdirol
drinksfoolgirl_craygirl_devilgirl_witch
goodgreenheartJC-LOLJC_doubledown
JC_OMG_signkisslaughingman_in_lmocking
mr47_04musicokroflsarcastic
sm_80tonguevishenka_33vomitwassat
yahooshoot
Advertisement

Archives

2020
2019
2018
2017
2016
2015
2014
2013
2012
2011
2010
2009
2008
0000
Advertisement

How to comment

•    Don't insult other visitors. Offensive comments will be deleted without warning.

•    Comments are accepted in English only.

•    No swearing words in comments, otherwise such comments will be censored.

•    Your nickname and avatar are randomly selected. If you don't post comments for 7 days, they both are reset.

•    To choose another avatar, click the ‘Random avatar’ link.