• Don't insult other visitors. Offensive comments will be deleted without warning.
• Comments are accepted in English only.
• No swearing words in comments, otherwise such comments will be censored.
• Your nickname and avatar are randomly selected. If you don't post comments for 7 days, they both are reset.
• To choose another avatar, click the ‘Random avatar’ link.
fruit in the wild what i would prefer any day before domestic counterpart - wild strawberry, more sweet, more tasty, richer with vitamins, it is small tho.
for example-- many of the preservatives in food we've been using and building materials in our homes are in fact toxic. they significantly increase risk of cancer and other health problems, and therefore have a high end cost for the individual and for society. gene-spliced GMO stuff just might, too. there's still a lot of science debate on it...
no, wrong. GMO crops are apparently harmless for human consumption, but it's the side-issues that are being debated right now, such as contamination of non-GMO strains, environmental effects, lack of regulation and labeling, etc.
also, since many GMO crops are engineered to thrive in the presence of pesticides like "roundup," this naturally encourages factory farming to go heavy on such pesticides. which gets transmitted to the consumer, you know.
nfertility-business-booms-1370181154
http://truth-out.org/news/item/20516-in-depth-journal-retracts-independent-study
-linking-monsanto-gmo-corn-to-cancer-in-rats