Firstly, you can see how the size of the US drastically changes as you move it north or south.
Some countries are significantly larger than they should be thanks to the Mercator projection, while others – anything near the equator – are definitely getting a bum deal. The US falls somewhere in the middle.
On a standard map it’s dwarfed by Canada, but here you can see that moving it to where Canada is located makes it seem even more prominent than it already is.
Note: This post will frequently use the USA as shorthand for the 48 contiguous states. We love Hawaii and Alaska, honest – it’s just easier to fit things in this way. Alaska is HUGE. Or is it…
And if Canada is moved down to where the US is, it’s clear that they aren’t as dissimilar in size as most people think.
People often forget how big Australia is because it’s so far away from other land masses. Here’s what happens when you move it over Europe.
Yep, it pretty much covers the whole of the continent. Struth!
Back to Alaska – this map shows that, while it’s still the biggest US state, it’s nowhere near as big as most maps make it look.
And if you move the USA’s second largest state, Texas, over the top of it, you can see there isn’t too much difference.
Or, at least, not THIS much difference.
Now onto a continent that usually takes up the whole of the bottom of a map – Antarctica.
The Mercator projection really goes to shit when it comes to land masses that cover the poles. It’s usually impossible to tell how big Antarctica really is just from looking at a map, but using this tool we can see it’s roughly the size of western Africa. So now you know.
This map shows how big the USA is compared with Europe, but it also does something else rather interesting…
This map actually shows the exact latitude of the USA, so it really helps you understand the relative positions of cities on opposite sides of the Atlantic.
For instance, Paris actually sits just north of the Canadian border, Chicago is found at nearly the exact same latitude as Istanbul, and Florida extends as far south as southern Egypt!
And if you do the same thing with the UK, it’s easy to understand why we’re not exactly used to warm weather.
To the west, the UK shares a latitude with deepest Canada, and on the right you can see that Edinburgh is on a level with Moscow.
But because it’s so far north, the UK also benefits from the shortcomings of the Mercator projection.
If Britain were on the equator it would be absolutely tiny. But at least the weather would be tolerable…
Greenland is arguably the place that is most blatantly taking the piss.
On the equator it would be a similar size to many central African countries, and though it’s still big compared with the US, it’s not quite as terrifying as it once was.
Overlaying California on top of the UK, you get a sense of just how tiny we really are.
Or, perhaps, how much we (try to) punch above our weight?
Things really get crazy when you move the US (minus Alaska and Hawaii) down under.
Being so close to the equator, Africa gets mightily screwed by the Mercator projection. Here’s what happens to the Democratic Republic of the Congo as you move it north.
And here’s what happens when you overlay the five largest countries in Africa on top of the USA.
In case you’re wondering, from largest to smallest they are: 1. Algeria (red), 2. DRC (pink), 3. Sudan (blue), 4. Libya (purple), and 5. Chad (orange).
Staying with the States, a Reddit user had the great idea of seeing what would happen to a rectangular state, such as Colorado, as you move it north from the equator.
And finally, here’s what happens when you place the 10 largest countries in the world next to each other on the equator.
There are some rankings that say the US is larger than China (thanks to dependencies/water etc.), but either way, you get the point.