• Don't insult other visitors. Offensive comments will be deleted without warning.
• Comments are accepted in English only.
• No swearing words in comments, otherwise such comments will be censored.
• Your nickname and avatar are randomly selected. If you don't post comments for 7 days, they both are reset.
• To choose another avatar, click the ‘Random avatar’ link.
And that's one of the many reasons we love them.
Why the down votes?
Consider the source and you'll know why.
just listen to climate experts on climate summit what they are saying when asked offcamera about climate changes.
Ask yourself why are you talking about climate change and not about global warming?
Climate change is natural phenomenon and climate changes since begining. Global warming is passe, it can't be substantiated so we now have climate change.
Deborah,
your "known researchers" asserted that ocean level will rise 100 meters deluging many countries by now. ups they were wrong. icebergs melt? In the same time on the other side of globe ice is created.
oh wow, that some demented thinking there my friend.
nobody "off camera" say that they don't "believe in in climate change" that's just your wishful thinking
yes the variation of the climate is natural, but the climate change extremes we are seeing are due to our pollution and it's not only fairly easy to understand, it's proven every year with the breach of record temperatures.
the average temperature are increasing, even if it's not longer referred as global warming, it's still the same.
and nobody has said the ocean will rise a 100 meters, over the last 100 years the sea has risen 6 to 8 inches, the sea rise by 2100 is expected to be about 7 foot.
and the main issue with ice is it's not being generated as much as it used to be, and the ice on land is not refreshed either.
See, this is what I mean... I simply ask to pick ANY scientific study and come back with a logical reason why they are wrong and what is the reply? Some vague, verifiable accusation about something apparently evert researcher says off camera...
Well, if they say it off camera and thus there is no proof of it. HOW WOULD YOU KNOW ABOUT IT???
So yeah...
Unverifiable* Of course but I suppose you'll tell me I slipped, how I know you're actually right, and that I'm actually an agent of the secret conspiracy of Liberal shapeshifting Alien Lizard people.
P.S. The earth isn't flat either. NASA checked!
Once again there IS proof. There are enough reports which, once again, you can pick any one from and explain why they are wrong.
If climate change caused by humans is so fake where are the hunderds of scientists and researchers then that can show it's fake?
There IS a 97 -100% consensus among climate scientists that humans are causing it though.
Over 99% of the published papers agree.
You can check the Wikipedia page on "scientific consensus on climate change" and yes, yes... Wikipedia can be edited...
BUT the links on that wiki page to IOP Science, a peer reviewed and highly recommended scientific paper publisher are definitely NOT edited!
And even though the hordes of scientists claiming it's a hoax seem to be missing, a group of 11.000 scientists speatheaded by Oregon State university scientists William J. Ripple and Christopher Wolf that was published in the journal "BioScience" in 2019 are very present.
There was something else you said...
Hmmmm. Oh yeah! Trying to say anyone believing in human caused climate change is the same as a flat Earther and NASA checked...
Well, not only Oregon State university scientists are not known for believing the Earth is flat, NASA itself, as you said, has other views.
Why don't you google "climate nasa gov scientific consensus" since you agree with NASA , see what they have to say about the matter on their own site...
The EPA reports that emissions of criteria air pollutants and their precursors declined 77 percent between 1970 and 2019. For example, emissions of ammonia and volatile organic compounds, both of which contribute to the formation of criteria air pollutants, declined by 8 and 47 percent, respectively, between 1990 and 2019. Emissions of SO2 declined by 91 percent, while those of carbon monoxide (CO) declined 69 percent. In addition, emissions of air toxics declined 74 percent between 1990 and 2017. Finally, EPA’s 2020 inventory of greenhouse gas emissions, also shows a long-term decline in the emissions of these substances since 2005.
So because there has been SOME (and no man made pollution hasn't gone "waaaay down" because of Covid, and even if it did, industries are starting up again) reduction in the past 2 years, that should suddenly reverse the past 60, 70 years of damage?
Nothing on such a vast and complex scale as Earth's ecological system changes that fast...
And yes pollution has gone down thanks to the efforts of US the people that understand dumping and pumping vast amounts of trash and dangerous waste on and and in land, sea, and air is OBVIOUSLY not good . Not you climate deniers.
If I throw 5 barrels of waste that contains biohazard material in a lake for 60 years, and reduce that to 4 AND throwing 2 barrels for for years because I was sick and now start increasing that to 3 barrels again, I don't have a clean healthy lake.
And I said it enough times already; There is enough scientific proof. Pick a paper and explain why it's wrong. As I said, almost every scientist agrees.
I've given names, referrals to scientific paper sites, NASA, etc. All people and places with decades of proven worth. It's enough.
You can find enough universities, institutes, etc yourself saying the same. I found my info in a few minutes on google.
Unless you disprove a scientific paper I see no reason to say more on the matter.
People can decide for themselves.
I'm old enough to have been around in the 80's when scientists and "experts", (probably the same ones as now) asserted that an ice age was INEVITABLE before the turn of the century.
Look. This picture is clearly about a car that is over compensation and eats much more fuel than it is normal. In the US people love cars which made to destroy fuel and not for efficient transportation.
This vehicle is also the symbol of the Ritch who gives a damn about everything else. The symbol of the biggest selfishness that lead nowhere good.
So if you think the comment "climate change is fake" is a statement and not a sarcastic criticism, turn the mirror and look at yourself.
It was sarcasm.
B please don't you get it?
Oh my! Weakminded people are downwoters.
In the refection she is kissing him.
With all that glass it'll be easy to see them coming.