Instead of spending $2 trillion invading Iraq and staying there for over eight years the United States could have done much more with that money. See the kinds of positive impact that money could have made instead.
Daily picdump [WEEKEND EDITION] (86 pics)
Funny Picdump (25 pics)
Friday Gifdump (30 gifs)
Demotivators Picdump (16 pics)
Morning Picdump (52 pics)
|
Advertisement
|
TOP 100 Daily Pics of the Week
TOP 20 Posts of the Week
TOP 50 Funny Pics of the Week
TOP 25 Gifs of the Week
TOP 30 Videos of the Week
Comments (14):
Show all comments1. Heath care on the US is ~17% of GDP. $14.2 trillion x 17% = $2.4 trillion.
2. Direct military cost in Iraq from 2001-2011 is $757.8 billion
One of the posters is about making everyone literate. Besides not being possible, the creator of these posters is illiterate.
except for creating the United States
and for ending
slavery,
Genocide,
Fascism,
Nazism
and a few other 'unpleasant' institutions and regimes
All that food sent to Africa and the people it was intended for might have got 10%
if you sent money to affrica to end poverty, they reproduce like locust and 10 years later you have a new problem of famine with double the population to feed
sending money to africa will not resolve any problem.
they need to change their society .
Limit chidrens to 3 by family
It's his fan club I can't stand!!