This woman is 51 years old. Her name is Nigella Lawson. She is a chef. She smokes, drinks alcohol and eats meat, butter, and desserts which are considered to be “very unhealthy”.
And this is Gillian McKeith. She is also 51 years old. She is a healthy diet guru who is devoted to a holistic approach to health and nutrition based on fruit and vegetable diet plans. She promotes vegetarianism and regular cleansing enemas.
These are types of meals promoted by Gillian.
These are examples of meals cooked and promoted by Nigella.
You are the one to decide whose meals are more tasty and healthy.
• Don't insult other visitors. Offensive comments will be deleted without warning.
• Comments are accepted in English only.
• No swearing words in comments, otherwise such comments will be censored.
• Your nickname and avatar are randomly selected. If you don't post comments for 7 days, they both are reset.
• To choose another avatar, click the ‘Random avatar’ link.
Nigella genes > Gillian genes
unless you live on neptune, it's easy to see that the first woman's meals are tastier and the second woman's are healthier... and that one woman is pretty old and one is fairly young. "genes," my arse.
was there a point to this post, anyway?
How is comparing pictures of two people and their food an accurate representation of a group?
also retarded post. A unhealthy meat eater looks better then a healthy person, that must mean its good to eat fats and desserts! (yay for you, feel free to live in blissfull ignorance ;) )
see...actualy i might not be as ignorant as you are..
It is a luxury that we are allowed to choose what we eat. But no matter what you eat, I think it's no one's business to tell a starving person what they can and cannot eat. A starving person isn't forced to eat something if they don't want to, but they should at least be given that option.
But getting back on topic a bit, this post comparing a vegetarian and an omnivore is totally ridiculous and doesn't prove any point for either side. You cannot judge a person just based on their diet. Neither diet automatically (or even generally) defines your health, personality, or appearance.
And about that "starving in africa" comment, a lot of vegans and vegetarians don't feel like it's better for those people to starve than to eat meat. There is enough food to feed the people who are starving, the reason the food does not get to them is political. Yes, it is all (or at least most) GMO and it could possibly be bad for someone's health in the long run…..but don't most of us do that anyway? Most of us eat things that could be bad for us and we're not even starving! I can't put myself in their shoes since I can't imagine what it is like to be starving, but I would prefer to eat GMO crops and live a few more years with a full stomach rather than starve to death.
Most of us here have the LUXURY to choose what we want to eat, were as the people starving don't. If you have the option to eat what you want, then you have no business telling people who don't have that option what to do.
and if saturated fat was really a normal component of our diet, then those who eat diets heavy in saturated fat probably wouldn't consistently have the number of health problems that they do, regardless of your little sample size of one.
GO VEGANS GO
eating Halloween candy - so good and so good for you
this bunny eats meat and drinks beer but has not smoke a cig in 122 days - LOL
so all of you people thumping your chests about the glory of meat- i guarantee you that it's not something you'll be enjoying for very long, based on where the world is going. and yes, i personally love meat. but reality is reality.