• Don't insult other visitors. Offensive comments will be deleted without warning.
• Comments are accepted in English only.
• No swearing words in comments, otherwise such comments will be censored.
• Your nickname and avatar are randomly selected. If you don't post comments for 7 days, they both are reset.
• To choose another avatar, click the ‘Random avatar’ link.
Only one african descendant. I think there is more in europe.
#6 This one look too sad. A little older and it would look like if she was a broken heart.
People who are always demanding equal depiction of every single minority in any display are despicable...
There is an old photographer's way of speech: A picture should BE something, rather than SHOW something. No matter how cute the kid in front of the camera, if all you do is showing the cuteness of the kid, then you haven't created photographic art. The only picture I think gets close to "being" something is #6; I think that is really great.
Of course it is "allowed" to show the cuteness of kid, even if the photos are not photographic art. But then: DO show the cuteness of the kids! Adding stuffet wolves and knitted hats with rabbit ears shows only the cuteness of the rabbit ears. If knitted rabbit ears is required to make the kid cute, do you then really show the cuteness of the kid? And if not: Do the knitted rabbit ears contribute to the photo "being" something, rahter than just "showing" something? And does showing knittet rabbit ears really make it a great photo?