Pederson Glacier, Alaska then:
Pedersen Glacier now:
Coral reefs in American Somoa then:
Coral reefs in American Somoa now:
Northwestern Glacier, Alaska then:
Northwestern Glacier now:
Muir Glacier, Alaska then:
Muir Glacier now:
Carroll Glacier, Alaska then:
Carroll Glacier now:
"Australia’s fires are like nothing seen ever before"
"Before and after coral bleaching on Christmas Island where 90% of the reef has died"
McCarty Glacier, Alaska then:
McCarty Glacier now:
"The Arctic 103 years ago compared to today."
Muir Glacier, Alaska then:
Muir Glacier now:
"Manila before and after quarantine"
"The fall of the great berrier reef is so over looked it’s not even funny, what have we come too in the last 5 years"
Okpilak Glacier, Alaska then:
Okpilak Glacier now:
"Australia - These two photos were taken in the same place 4 weeks apart."
"The Cape Romano Dome House in Florida used to be on land and now the domes slowly march out to sea (currently 300ft away)"
"Great Barrier Reef - Before & After"
Bear Glacier, Alaska then:
Bear Glacier now:
Coral around Lizard Island, Australia then:
Coral around Lizard Island now:
• Don't insult other visitors. Offensive comments will be deleted without warning.
• Comments are accepted in English only.
• No swearing words in comments, otherwise such comments will be censored.
• Your nickname and avatar are randomly selected. If you don't post comments for 7 days, they both are reset.
• To choose another avatar, click the ‘Random avatar’ link.
The dead coral become white.
OR, we could all think and save as much energy as possible as individuals and get all companies to stop putting profit before everything. Just because a business has to make money doesn't mean they should do it no matter what the consequences are.
And yes the climate has changed obviously but, but even if it's not 100% caused by us, something tells me that the fact that these last 100 years or so we've been through an industrial age and the amount of damage we've caused in the meantime means that percentage is a lot closer to 100 than 0.
Most scientists in the world agree. And yes, obviously you can find a few that say differently.
But just as the researchers that claim smoking is not that bad for you, or that fat is way worse than sugar, you'll find their research is funded by certain political or economical people that just happen to make a lot of profit with those kind of results.
...check sat pictures for last 30-40 years before making total @$$ out of yourself.
P.S. Don't ask stupid questions if you don't want to hear stupid answers.